Publication:
Extracorporeal Ammonia Clearance for Hyperammonemia in Critically Ill Patients: A Scoping Review

dc.contributor.authorThummaporn Naorungrojen_US
dc.contributor.authorFumitaka Yanaseen_US
dc.contributor.authorGlenn M. Eastwooden_US
dc.contributor.authorIan Baldwinen_US
dc.contributor.authorRinaldo Bellomoen_US
dc.contributor.otherSiriraj Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Melbourneen_US
dc.contributor.otherMonash Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherAustin Hospitalen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-04T09:20:54Z
dc.date.available2022-08-04T09:20:54Z
dc.date.issued2021-07-01en_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Hyperammonemia is a life-threatening condition. However, clearance of ammonia via extracorporeal treatment has not been systematically evaluated. Methods: We searched EMBASE and MEDLINE databases. We included all publications reporting ammonia clearance by extracorporeal treatment in adult and pediatric patients with clearance estimated by direct dialysate ammonia measurement or calculated by formula. Two reviewers screened and extracted data independently. Results: We found 1,770 articles with 312 appropriate for assessment and 28 studies meeting eligibility criteria. Most of the studies were case reports. Hyperammonemia was typically secondary to inborn errors of metabolisms in children and to liver failure in adult patients. Ammonia clearance was most commonly reported during continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) and appeared to vary markedly from <5 mL/min/m2 to >250 mL/min/m2. When measured during intermittent hemodialysis (IHD), clearance was highest and correlated with blood flow rate (R2 = 0.853; p < 0.001). When measured during CRRT, ammonia clearance could be substantial and correlated with effluent flow rate (EFR; R2 = 0.584; p < 0.001). Neither correlated with ammonia reduction. Peritoneal dialysis (PD) achieved minimal clearance, and other extracorporeal techniques were rarely studied. Conclusions: Extracorporeal ammonia clearance varies widely with sometimes implausible values. Treatment modality, blood flow, and EFR, however, appear to affect such clearance with IHD achieving the highest values, PD achieving minimal values, and CRRT achieving substantial values especially at high EFRs. The role of other techniques remains unclear. These findings can help inform practice and future studies.en_US
dc.identifier.citationBlood Purification. Vol.50, No.4-5 (2021), 453-461en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1159/000512100en_US
dc.identifier.issn14219735en_US
dc.identifier.issn02535068en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85097809217en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/78114
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85097809217&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleExtracorporeal Ammonia Clearance for Hyperammonemia in Critically Ill Patients: A Scoping Reviewen_US
dc.typeReviewen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85097809217&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections