Publication:
Meta-analysis of effectiveness of steroid-sparing attack prevention in MOG-IgG-associated disorder

dc.contributor.authorSmathorn Thakolwiboonen_US
dc.contributor.authorHannah Zhao-Flemingen_US
dc.contributor.authorAmputch Karukoteen_US
dc.contributor.authorYang Mao-Draayeren_US
dc.contributor.authorEoin P. Flanaganen_US
dc.contributor.authorMirla Avilaen_US
dc.contributor.otherSiriraj Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Michigan Medical Schoolen_US
dc.contributor.otherTexas Tech University Health Sciences Center at Lubbocken_US
dc.contributor.otherMayo Clinicen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-04T09:08:22Z
dc.date.available2022-08-04T09:08:22Z
dc.date.issued2021-11-01en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: To estimate the efficacy of the commonly used long-term immunotherapies in myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein IgG associated disorder (MOGAD) Method: A comprehensive search of the databases including PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane database was performed for all studies that assessed the efficacy of azathioprine (AZA), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), rituximab (RTX), and maintenance intravenous immunoglobulin (mIVIG) in MOGAD. The random-effect model is used to estimate the standard mean difference (SMD) of annualized relapse rate (ARR) and expanded disability status scale (EDSS), mean ARR, probabilities of relapse and worsening EDSS during treatment. Results: The initial search identified 714 articles, and 21 satisfied eligibility criteria. All immunotherapies significantly reduced ARR in both pediatric and adult populations. Relapse probabilities and pooled mean ARR (SE: standard error) during therapies were as follow: AZA 53.1% [95%CI 37.4% to 68.2%; ARR 0.291 (0.134)], MMF 38.5% [95%CI 19.4% to 62.0%; ARR 0.836 (0.176)], RTX 48.9% [95%CI 37.8% to 60.2%; ARR 0.629(0.162)], and mIVIG 25.3% [95%CI 14.0% to 41.3%; ARR 0.081 (0.058)]. Only RTX significantly improved EDSS, SMD -0.499 (95%CI -0.996 to -0.003). The proportion of worsening EDSS with immunotherapies were 20.7% (95%CI 8.8% to 41.6%), 8.1% (95%CI 1.1% to 41.2%), and 10.8% (95%CI 3.8% to 26.8%) for AZA, MMF, and RTX, respectively. Conclusion: These commonly used immunotherapies significantly reduced ARR in MOGAD. Only RTX had a significant benefit in EDSS improvement. However, a substantial portion of patients continued to relapse with treatment. Randomized controlled studies are needed to verify these findings and perform head-to-head comparisons among these treatment options.en_US
dc.identifier.citationMultiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders. Vol.56, (2021)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.msard.2021.103310en_US
dc.identifier.issn22110356en_US
dc.identifier.issn22110348en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85116583463en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/77723
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85116583463&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.subjectNeuroscienceen_US
dc.titleMeta-analysis of effectiveness of steroid-sparing attack prevention in MOG-IgG-associated disorderen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85116583463&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections