Publication:
Pileated gibbon density in relation to habitat characteristics and post-logging forest recovery

dc.contributor.authorRungnapa Phoonjampaen_US
dc.contributor.authorAndreas Koenigen_US
dc.contributor.authorWarren Y. Brockelmanen_US
dc.contributor.authorCarola Borriesen_US
dc.contributor.authorGeorge A. Galeen_US
dc.contributor.authorJohn P. Carrollen_US
dc.contributor.authorTommaso Savinien_US
dc.contributor.otherKing Mongkuts University of Technology Thonburien_US
dc.contributor.otherWWF Thailanden_US
dc.contributor.otherStony Brook Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherThe University of Georgiaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-03T07:55:51Z
dc.date.available2018-05-03T07:55:51Z
dc.date.issued2011-09-01en_US
dc.description.abstractAlthough it is known that forest loss and degradation negatively impact most forest-dwelling primates, such relationships are difficult to quantify because many primates are difficult to survey over large areas. Furthermore, recovery times are also difficult to assess due to a lack of long-term data. Here, we determined how forest characteristics and habitat disturbance correlate with the abundance of pileated gibbons, Hylobates pileatus. We studied a population in Khao Ang Rue Nai Wildlife Sanctuary in southeastern Thailand, assessed its density using an auditory method combined with distance sampling at 24 randomly placed sample sites. In addition, we determined how simple forest structural characteristics and habitat disturban ce correlate with the gibbon abundance. Average gibbon density per site was 1.02 ± 0.16 (SE) groups/km 2 (range 0-2.74). Bivariate analyses indicated that densities depended on food tree biomass, level of disturbance, evergreen forest cover, time since protection, and distance to the sanctuary boundary. Multiple regression analysis suggested evergreen forest cover and distance to boundary were the most influential factors. Because evergreen forest cover, time since protection, and habitat disturbance are correlated, these results suggest a direct dependence of gibbon densities on mature, undisturbed evergreen forest. While gibbons can persist in disturbed areas if the forest is protected, it appears that recovery to previous densities may take decades. We suggest that this is due to the slow pace of forest regeneration and/or poor recovery potential of gibbons. © 2011 The Author(s). Journal compilation © 2011 by The Association for Tropical Biology and Conservation.en_US
dc.identifier.citationBiotropica. Vol.43, No.5 (2011), 619-627en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1744-7429.2010.00743.xen_US
dc.identifier.issn17447429en_US
dc.identifier.issn00063606en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-80052403227en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/11277
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=80052403227&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectAgricultural and Biological Sciencesen_US
dc.titlePileated gibbon density in relation to habitat characteristics and post-logging forest recoveryen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=80052403227&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections