Publication:
The results of transcatheter closure of VSD using amplatzer® device and nit occlud® Lê coil

dc.contributor.authorPaweena Chungsomprasongen_US
dc.contributor.authorKritvikrom Durongpisitkulen_US
dc.contributor.authorChodchanok Vijarnsornen_US
dc.contributor.authorJarupim Soongswangen_US
dc.contributor.authorTrong Phi Lêen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversitat Hamburgen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-03T08:21:39Z
dc.date.available2018-05-03T08:21:39Z
dc.date.issued2011-12-01en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: We retrospectively reviewed the result of patients who underwent transcatheter closure of ventricular septal defect (VSD) using Amplatzer® Perimembranous or Amplatzer® muscular VSD device (the Amplatzer® group) and Nit Occlud® Lê VSD Coil (the Pfm group). Background: Perimembranous type (PmVSD) and doubly committed subarterial (DCSA) VSD were the major isolated congenital heart defects in Thai children. Transcatheter device closure technique for both types of VSD has emerged as an alternative treatment to surgery. Methods: Retrospectively, data was reviewed between 2003 and 2009. Results: 116 patients were enrolled. Device or coil was successfully implanted in 94%. Complete closure at 24 hr is slightly higher in the Amplatzer® group. The average size of VSD in the Amplatzer® group was larger than the Pfm group (P = 0.001). The Pfm coil was primarily deployed in DCSA VSD when compared with the Amplatzer® group (P < 0.01). At 6 months follow-up the residual shunt was comparable (P = 0.054). There was only one transient AV block (AVB) in the Pfm group and 5 AVB in the Amplatzer® group. Four pacemakers were placed in the Amplatzer® group. Conclusions: Transcatheter closure of VSD in both Pm VSD and DCSA can be achieved by using either of the device. The Amplatzer® VSD device had the advantage of closure of larger defects with immediate less residual shunt but appeared to have a significant number of 3° AVB, which required pacemaker implantation. The Nit Occlud® Lê VSD Coil had the advantage of closure of both types of defects, in particular DCSA VSD with only small residual shunt. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.identifier.citationCatheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. Vol.78, No.7 (2011), 1032-1040en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/ccd.23084en_US
dc.identifier.issn1522726Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn15221946en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-80055093505en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/12185
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=80055093505&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleThe results of transcatheter closure of VSD using amplatzer® device and nit occlud® Lê coilen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=80055093505&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections