Publication:
Agent-based models of malaria transmission: A systematic review

dc.contributor.authorNeal R. Smithen_US
dc.contributor.authorJames M. Traueren_US
dc.contributor.authorManoj Gambhiren_US
dc.contributor.authorJack S. Richardsen_US
dc.contributor.authorRichard J. Maudeen_US
dc.contributor.authorJonathan M. Keithen_US
dc.contributor.authorJennifer A. Fleggen_US
dc.contributor.otherIBM Australia Ltden_US
dc.contributor.otherHarvard School of Public Healthen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Melbourneen_US
dc.contributor.otherMonash Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherNuffield Department of Clinical Medicineen_US
dc.contributor.otherBurnet Instituteen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-23T11:19:02Z
dc.date.available2019-08-23T11:19:02Z
dc.date.issued2018-08-17en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2018 The Author(s). Background: Much of the extensive research regarding transmission of malaria is underpinned by mathematical modelling. Compartmental models, which focus on interactions and transitions between population strata, have been a mainstay of such modelling for more than a century. However, modellers are increasingly adopting agent-based approaches, which model hosts, vectors and/or their interactions on an individual level. One reason for the increasing popularity of such models is their potential to provide enhanced realism by allowing system-level behaviours to emerge as a consequence of accumulated individual-level interactions, as occurs in real populations. Methods: A systematic review of 90 articles published between 1998 and May 2018 was performed, characterizing agent-based models (ABMs) relevant to malaria transmission. The review provides an overview of approaches used to date, determines the advantages of these approaches, and proposes ideas for progressing the field. Results: The rationale for ABM use over other modelling approaches centres around three points: the need to accurately represent increased stochasticity in low-transmission settings; the benefits of high-resolution spatial simulations; and heterogeneities in drug and vaccine efficacies due to individual patient characteristics. The success of these approaches provides avenues for further exploration of agent-based techniques for modelling malaria transmission. Potential extensions include varying elimination strategies across spatial landscapes, extending the size of spatial models, incorporating human movement dynamics, and developing increasingly comprehensive parameter estimation and optimization techniques. Conclusion: Collectively, the literature covers an extensive array of topics, including the full spectrum of transmission and intervention regimes. Bringing these elements together under a common framework may enhance knowledge of, and guide policies towards, malaria elimination. However, because of the diversity of available models, endorsing a standardized approach to ABM implementation may not be possible. Instead it is recommended that model frameworks be contextually appropriate and sufficiently described. One key recommendation is to develop enhanced parameter estimation and optimization techniques. Extensions of current techniques will provide the robust results required to enhance current elimination efforts.en_US
dc.identifier.citationMalaria Journal. Vol.17, No.1 (2018)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12936-018-2442-yen_US
dc.identifier.issn14752875en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85051747278en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/45987
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85051747278&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectImmunology and Microbiologyen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleAgent-based models of malaria transmission: A systematic reviewen_US
dc.typeReviewen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85051747278&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections