Publication:
Thai version of the foot function index: A cross-cultural adaptation with reliability and validity evaluation

dc.contributor.authorSunee Bovonsunthonchaien_US
dc.contributor.authorSuthasinee Thong-Onen_US
dc.contributor.authorRoongtiwa Vachalathitien_US
dc.contributor.authorWarinda Intiravoranonten_US
dc.contributor.authorSarawut Suwannaraten_US
dc.contributor.authorRichard Smithen_US
dc.contributor.otherThe University of Sydneyen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-05T05:11:38Z
dc.date.available2020-10-05T05:11:38Z
dc.date.issued2020-09-10en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2020 The Author(s). Background: The study aimed to translate the foot function index (FFI) questionnaire to Thai and to determine psychometric properties of the questionnaire among individuals with plantar foot complaints. Methods: The Thai version of the FFI (FFI-Th) was adapted according to a forward and backward translation protocol by two independent translators and analyzed by a linguist and a committee. The FFI-Th was administered among 49 individuals with plantar foot complaints to determine internal consistency, reliability, and validity. Cronbach's alpha and the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC3,1) were used to test the internal consistency and test-retest reliability. The Principal Component Analysis with varimax rotation method was used to test the factor structure and construct validity. Furthermore, the criterion validity was tested using Pearson's correlation coefficient (rp) between the FFI-Th and the visual analogue pain scale (pain-VAS) as well as the EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L). Results: The FFI-Th showed good to excellent internal consistency and test-retest reliability in the total score, pain, disability, and activity limitation subscales. The Principal Component Analysis produced 4 principal factors from the FFI-Th items. Criterion validity of the FFI-Th total score showed moderate to strong correlations with pain-VAS and EQ-5D-5L, and EQ-VAS scores. Conclusion: The FFI-Th was a reliable and valid questionnaire to assess the foot function in a Thai population. Trial registration: NCT03161314 (08/05/2017).en_US
dc.identifier.citationBMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation. Vol.12, No.1 (2020)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13102-020-00206-8en_US
dc.identifier.issn20521847en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85091582813en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/59100
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85091582813&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectHealth Professionsen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleThai version of the foot function index: A cross-cultural adaptation with reliability and validity evaluationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85091582813&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections