Publication:
Field trials of an asexual blood stage malaria vaccine: Studies of the synthetic peptide polymer SPf66 in Thailand and the analytic plan for a phase IIb efficacy study

dc.contributor.authorW. R. Ballouen_US
dc.contributor.authorD. M. Gordonen_US
dc.contributor.authorJ. C. Sadoffen_US
dc.contributor.authorK. H. Websteren_US
dc.contributor.authorJ. Wittesen_US
dc.contributor.otherWalter Reed Army Institute of Researchen_US
dc.contributor.otherStatistics Collaborativeen_US
dc.contributor.otherArmed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Thailanden_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherShoklo Malaria Research Uniten_US
dc.contributor.otherJohn Radcliffe Hospitalen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-04T06:52:02Z
dc.date.available2018-07-04T06:52:02Z
dc.date.issued1995-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstractSeveral years ago the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (WRAIR) initiated an independent analysis of the candidate malaria blood stage vaccine SPf66. WRAIR contracted for the synthesis and formulation of SPf66 in United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) inspected laboratories within the U.S., and in 1992, filed an Investigational New Drug (IND) application with the FDA. Preclinical studies indicated that the vaccine could be synthesized to meet its release specifications, and when adjuvanted with alum, was essentially equivalent to Colombian produced SPf66 in regards to immunogenicity in preclinical studies of rodents and primates, and in human volunteers in Phase I studies. The goal of these efforts was ultimately to conduct a Phase IIb field trial to determine the safety and efficacy of SPf66 produced under current Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMP). Such a trial is currently underway in a malaria endemic refugee camp along the Thai-Burmese border. Here we briefly describe the study and present the formal analytic plan that was submitted to regulatory authorities in the United States for analysis of the study results. We believe such independent confirmatory studies are an essential part of the vaccine development process and are required to provide important data regarding the safety and efficacy of candidate vaccines in diverse geographical regions, and as a means to assess their role in the context of broader malaria control programmes. © 1995, Cambridge University Press. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.identifier.citationParasitology. Vol.110, No.S1 (1995), S25-S36en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S0031182000001463en_US
dc.identifier.issn14698161en_US
dc.identifier.issn00311820en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-0029014181en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/17234
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0029014181&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectAgricultural and Biological Sciencesen_US
dc.subjectImmunology and Microbiologyen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleField trials of an asexual blood stage malaria vaccine: Studies of the synthetic peptide polymer SPf66 in Thailand and the analytic plan for a phase IIb efficacy studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0029014181&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections