Publication:
Norovirus Monitoring in Oysters Using Two Different Extraction Methods

dc.contributor.authorThamapan Tunyakittaveewarden_US
dc.contributor.authorKitwadee Ruppromen_US
dc.contributor.authorKannika Pombubpaen_US
dc.contributor.authorNopporn Howteerakulen_US
dc.contributor.authorLeera Kittigulen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-27T07:20:48Z
dc.date.available2020-01-27T07:20:48Z
dc.date.issued2019-12-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2019, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature. Detection of noroviruses in bivalve shellfish is difficult because of the low concentration of norovirus and the presence of reverse transcription (RT)-PCR inhibitors. This study aimed to assess the presence of noroviruses in oysters extracted using a proteinase K extraction (ISO 15216 method) and an adsorption–elution method. Seventy oyster samples were extracted using the two extraction methods and evaluated using RT-nested PCR. The results showed norovirus detection rates at an equal frequency of 28.6%, of which a total of 48 (68.6%) samples had corresponding positive or negative results, while there were 22 (31.4%) samples with discrepant results. Norovirus genogroup (G)I, GII, and mixed GI and GII were detected in 20%, 4.3%, and 4.3% of samples, respectively, by the proteinase K extraction method, which comprised of GI.2, GI.5b, GI.6b, GII.4, and GII.17 genotypes. With the adsorption–elution method noroviruses were detected in 17.1%, 8.6%, and 2.9% of samples, respectively, which comprised of GI.2, GII.2, GII.4, and GII.17 genotypes. All norovirus-positive oyster samples were further estimated for genome copy number using RT-quantitative PCR. The oyster samples processed using the adsorption–elution method contained norovirus GI of 3.36 × 101–1.06 × 105 RNA copies/g of digestive tissues and GII of 1.29 × 103–1.62 × 104 RNA copies/g. Only GII (2.20 × 101 and 7.83 × 101 RNA copies/g) could be quantified in samples prepared using the proteinase K extraction method. The results demonstrate the different performance of the two sample-processing methods, and suggest the use of either extraction method in combination with RT-nested PCR for molecular surveillance of norovirus genotypes in oysters.en_US
dc.identifier.citationFood and Environmental Virology. Vol.11, No.4 (2019), 374-382en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s12560-019-09396-yen_US
dc.identifier.issn18670342en_US
dc.identifier.issn18670334en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85069687819en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/49695
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85069687819&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectAgricultural and Biological Sciencesen_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental Scienceen_US
dc.subjectImmunology and Microbiologyen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleNorovirus Monitoring in Oysters Using Two Different Extraction Methodsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85069687819&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections