Publication:
Exploring health-related quality of life among non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma survivors after completion of primary treatment: a cross-sectional study in Thailand

dc.contributor.authorPichitra Lekdamrongkulen_US
dc.contributor.authorKanaungnit Pongthavornkamolen_US
dc.contributor.authorAlex Molassiotisen_US
dc.contributor.authorAurawamon Sriyuktasuthen_US
dc.contributor.authorNoppadol Siritanaratkulen_US
dc.contributor.authorNatkamol Chansatitpornen_US
dc.contributor.otherSiriraj Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherHong Kong Polytechnic Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-04T09:09:06Z
dc.date.available2022-08-04T09:09:06Z
dc.date.issued2021-11-01en_US
dc.description.abstractPurposes: To investigate health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) and its influencing factors among non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) survivors after completion of primary treatment. Methods: A cross-sectional study with 312 NHL survivors after completing primary treatment using self-reported data collected through face-to-face interviews or postal survey between May 2019 and December 2019. Sociodemographic factors, clinical characteristics, physical symptom distress, anxiety, depression, unmet supportive care needs, and adaptation (post-traumatic growth and post-traumatic stress disorder) were assessed. Data analysis included ANOVA tests to investigate HR-QoL among NHL survivors at different time points and GEE to assess predictors of HR-QoL. Results: The mean score of HR-QoL was 136.05 (SD 19.12). HR-QoL scores reported by NHL survivors in phase I (6 months or less post-treatment) were significantly lower than those in phase II (> 6 months-4 years), phase III (> 4-9 years), and phase IV (over 9 years post-treatment). Regarding HR-QoL domains, NHL survivors in phase I had significantly lower physical well-being and functional well-being scores than those in phases II, III, and IV; and significantly lower lymphoma domain score than those in phase III. GEE analysis showed that physical symptom distress, anxiety, depression, unmet supportive care needs, poor adaptation, and receiving chemotherapy disrupted HR-QoL (all P <.001). Conclusions: Healthcare providers should re-prioritize intervention guidelines and survivorship care planning to promote HR-QoL among NHL survivors, particularly in phase I, through reducing physical and psychological symptom distress, addressing unmet needs, and enhancing adaptation outcomes.en_US
dc.identifier.citationSupportive Care in Cancer. Vol.29, No.11 (2021), 6511-6522en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00520-021-06246-1en_US
dc.identifier.issn14337339en_US
dc.identifier.issn09414355en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85105049159en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/77750
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85105049159&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleExploring health-related quality of life among non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma survivors after completion of primary treatment: a cross-sectional study in Thailanden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85105049159&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections