Publication:
Methods for the field evaluation of quantitative G6PD diagnostics: A review

dc.contributor.authorBenedikt Leyen_US
dc.contributor.authorGermana Banconeen_US
dc.contributor.authorLorenz Von Seidleinen_US
dc.contributor.authorKamala Thriemeren_US
dc.contributor.authorJack S. Richardsen_US
dc.contributor.authorGonzalo J. Domingoen_US
dc.contributor.authorRic N. Priceen_US
dc.contributor.otherMenzies School of Health Researchen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherNuffield Department of Clinical Medicineen_US
dc.contributor.otherBurnet Instituteen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Melbourneen_US
dc.contributor.otherPeter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunityen_US
dc.contributor.otherPATH Seattleen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-21T07:53:46Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-14T08:03:46Z
dc.date.available2018-12-21T07:53:46Z
dc.date.available2019-03-14T08:03:46Z
dc.date.issued2017-09-11en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2017 The Author(s). Individuals with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency are at risk of severe haemolysis following the administration of 8-aminoquinoline compounds. Primaquine is the only widely available 8-aminoquinoline for the radical cure of Plasmodium vivax. Tafenoquine is under development with the potential to simplify treatment regimens, but point-of-care (PoC) tests will be needed to provide quantitative measurement of G6PD activity prior to its administration. There is currently a lack of appropriate G6PD PoC tests, but a number of new tests are in development and are likely to enter the market in the coming years. As these are implemented, they will need to be validated in field studies. This article outlines the technical details for the field evaluation of novel quantitative G6PD diagnostics such as sample handling, reference testing and statistical analysis. Field evaluation is based on the comparison of paired samples, including one sample tested by the new assay at point of care and one sample tested by the gold-standard reference method, UV spectrophotometry in an established laboratory. Samples can be collected as capillary or venous blood; the existing literature suggests that potential differences in capillary or venous blood are unlikely to affect results substantially. The collection and storage of samples is critical to ensure preservation of enzyme activity, it is recommended that samples are stored at 4 °C and testing occurs within 4 days of collection. Test results can be visually presented as scatter plot, Bland-Altman plot, and a histogram of the G6PD activity distribution of the study population. Calculating the adjusted male median allows categorizing results according to G6PD activity to calculate standard performance indicators and to perform receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.en_US
dc.identifier.citationMalaria Journal. Vol.16, No.1 (2017)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12936-017-2017-3en_US
dc.identifier.issn14752875en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85029279612en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/42752
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85029279612&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectImmunology and Microbiologyen_US
dc.titleMethods for the field evaluation of quantitative G6PD diagnostics: A reviewen_US
dc.typeReviewen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85029279612&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections