Publication:
Temporal integration of monaural and dichotic frequency modulation

dc.contributor.authorKatherine N. Palandranien_US
dc.contributor.authorEric C. Hooveren_US
dc.contributor.authorTrevor Stavropoulosen_US
dc.contributor.authorAaron R. Seitzen_US
dc.contributor.authorSittiprapa Isaranguraen_US
dc.contributor.authorFrederick J. Gallunen_US
dc.contributor.authorDavid A. Eddinsen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of California, Riversideen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Maryland, College Parken_US
dc.contributor.otherOregon Health & Science Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of South Florida, Tampaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-04T08:01:35Z
dc.date.available2022-08-04T08:01:35Z
dc.date.issued2021-08-01en_US
dc.description.abstractFrequency modulation (FM) detection at low modulation frequencies is commonly used as an index of temporal fine-structure processing. The present study evaluated the rate of improvement in monaural and dichotic FM across a range of test parameters. In experiment I, dichotic and monaural FM detection was measured as a function of duration and modulator starting phase. Dichotic FM thresholds were lower than monaural FM thresholds and the modulator starting phase had no effect on detection. Experiment II measured monaural FM detection for signals that differed in modulation rate and duration such that the improvement with duration in seconds (carrier) or cycles (modulator) was compared. Monaural FM detection improved monotonically with the number of modulation cycles, suggesting that the modulator is extracted prior to detection. Experiment III measured dichotic FM detection for shorter signal durations to test the hypothesis that dichotic FM relies primarily on the signal onset. The rate of improvement decreased as duration increased, which is consistent with the use of primarily onset cues for the detection of dichotic FM. These results establish that improvement with duration occurs as a function of the modulation cycles at a rate consistent with the independent-samples model for monaural FM, but later cycles contribute less to detection in dichotic FM.en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of the Acoustical Society of America. Vol.150, No.2 (2021), 745-758en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1121/10.0005729en_US
dc.identifier.issn15208524en_US
dc.identifier.issn00014966en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85111987512en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/75834
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85111987512&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectArts and Humanitiesen_US
dc.subjectPhysics and Astronomyen_US
dc.titleTemporal integration of monaural and dichotic frequency modulationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85111987512&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections