Publication:
The Effect of Light Stress and Other Culture Conditions on Photoinhibition and Growth of Dunaliella tertiolecta

dc.contributor.authorJitpisut Seepratoomroshen_US
dc.contributor.authorPrayad Pokethitiyooken_US
dc.contributor.authorMetha Meetamen_US
dc.contributor.authorKittisak Yokthongwattanaen_US
dc.contributor.authorWenqiao Yuanen_US
dc.contributor.authorWanvisa Pugkaewen_US
dc.contributor.authorKunn Kangvansaicholen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherCenter for Environmental Healthen_US
dc.contributor.otherNorth Carolina State Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherPTTen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-11T02:25:40Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-14T08:04:21Z
dc.date.available2018-12-11T02:25:40Z
dc.date.available2019-03-14T08:04:21Z
dc.date.issued2016-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2015, Springer Science+Business Media New York. This work aimed to examine the effects of high light stress as well as other culture conditions including HCO3− concentration, temperature, salinity, and pre-acclimation on photoinhibition and growth of halotolerant alga Dunaliella tertiolecta. Significant photoinhibition of D. tertiolecta was observed during a short period of exposure (6 hours) to high intensity of lights (1000, 1500, and 2000 μmol photons m−2 s−1); however, after 2 days of continuous light exposure, the alga adapted to high light stress and reached similar growth rates as low light exposure. The increase in HCO3− concentration in the culture medium did not reduce photoinhibition, but the growth rate and chlorophyll contents increased with increasing HCO3− concentrations. Temperature had significant effects on photoinhibition. Combined high temperature and high light intensity led to more serious photoinhibition and reduced cell growth rates, so did combined low salinity and high light intensity. Pre-acclimation by 50, 200, or 500 μmol photons m−2 s−1 each for 1, 3, or 6 hours (a total of nine treatments) did not significantly influence photoinhibition or cell growth of D. tertiolecta, probably because the acclimation periods were not long enough.en_US
dc.identifier.citationApplied Biochemistry and Biotechnology. Vol.178, No.2 (2016), 396-407en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s12010-015-1882-xen_US
dc.identifier.issn15590291en_US
dc.identifier.issn02732289en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84958183828en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/43281
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84958183828&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biologyen_US
dc.subjectChemical Engineeringen_US
dc.subjectImmunology and Microbiologyen_US
dc.titleThe Effect of Light Stress and Other Culture Conditions on Photoinhibition and Growth of Dunaliella tertiolectaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84958183828&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections