Publication:
A qualitative exploration of the Thai alcohol policy in regulating alcohol industry's marketing strategies and commercial activities

dc.contributor.authorRatchakorn Kaewpramkusolen_US
dc.contributor.authorKate Senioren_US
dc.contributor.authorSutham Nanthamongkolchaien_US
dc.contributor.authorRichard Chenhallen_US
dc.contributor.otherMelbourne School of Population and Global Healthen_US
dc.contributor.otherThailand Ministry of Public Healthen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Wollongongen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-27T10:40:06Z
dc.date.available2020-01-27T10:40:06Z
dc.date.issued2019-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2018 Australasian Professional Society on Alcohol and other Drugs Introduction and Aims: The recognition of the association between the use of alcohol and negative health outcomes have led to the endorsement of the World Health Organization's global strategy to reduce the harmful use of alcohol. Given the capacities, capabilities and sociocultural contexts of Thailand, this study aims to examine the Thai alcohol policy against the global strategy's recommended policy measures for marketing control and identify areas for further policy development. Design and Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with the stakeholders from three sectors: the government, academia and civil society. Their perceptions of the Thai alcohol policy in regulating alcohol industry's commercial strategies and activities were discussed. Audio data were transcribed verbatim, systematically coded and thematically analysed. Results: Although the Thai Alcohol Control Act meticulously regulates the content of direct alcohol marketing, the volume of marketing and indirect alcohol marketing have become problematic and difficult for the government to address. The industry has worked to normalise the consumption of alcohol through repetitive brand exposure and their suggestion that drinking was integral for socialisation. The control of alcohol sponsorship was politically sensitive and legally ambiguous because alcohol sponsorship seemed to provide economic and social benefits and further reinforced the industry's positive image. Discussion and Conclusions: Despite the strict alcohol policy, gaps in the marketing regulations exist. Future policy development should place greater emphasis on alcohol sponsorship and branding through evidenced-based interventions. The interactions between the government and the industry should be monitored and restricted. Rigorous regulations, as seen for tobacco, are encouraged for alcohol marketing.en_US
dc.identifier.citationDrug and Alcohol Review. Vol.38, No.1 (2019), 25-33en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/dar.12885en_US
dc.identifier.issn14653362en_US
dc.identifier.issn09595236en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85059100212en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/52377
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85059100212&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleA qualitative exploration of the Thai alcohol policy in regulating alcohol industry's marketing strategies and commercial activitiesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85059100212&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections