Publication: H1N1 seasonal influenza virus evolutionary rate changed over time
2
Issued Date
2018-05-02
Resource Type
ISSN
18727492
01681702
01681702
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-85045454483
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Virus Research. Vol.250, (2018), 43-50
Suggested Citation
Ornpreya Suptawiwat, Alita Kongchanagul, Chompunuch Boonarkart, Prasert Auewarakul H1N1 seasonal influenza virus evolutionary rate changed over time. Virus Research. Vol.250, (2018), 43-50. doi:10.1016/j.virusres.2018.03.020 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/45172
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
H1N1 seasonal influenza virus evolutionary rate changed over time
Abstract
© 2018 Elsevier B.V. It was previously shown that the seasonal H1N1 influenza virus antigenic drift occurred at a slower rate than the seasonal H3N2 virus during the first decade of the 21th century. It was hypothesized that the slower antigenic evolution led to a decrease in average ages of infection, which in turn resulted in lower level of global viral circulation. It is unclear what caused the difference between the two viruses, but a plausible explanation may be related to the fact that the H1N1 virus had been in human population for much longer than the H3N2 virus. This would suggest that H1N1 antigenic drift in an earlier period may have been different from a more recent period. To test this hypothesis, we analyzed seasonal H1N1 influenza sequences during various time periods. In comparison to more recent H1N1 virus, the older H1N1 virus during the first half of the 20th century showed evidences of higher nonsynnonymous/synonymous ration (dN/dS) in its hemagglutinin (HA) gene. We compared amino acid sequence changes in the HA epitopes for each outbreak season and found that there were less changes in later years. Amino acid sequence diversity in the epitopes as measured by sequence entropy became smaller for each passing decade. These suggest that there might be some limit to the antigenic drift. The longer an influenza virus has drifted in human population, the less flexibility it may become. With less flexibility to adapt and escape the host immunity, the virus may have to rely more on younger naïve population.