Publication:
Strategies to enhance oral delivery of amphotericin B: a comparison of uncoated and enteric-coated nanostructured lipid carriers

dc.contributor.authorPataranapa Nimtrakulen_US
dc.contributor.authorPakawadee Sermsappasuken_US
dc.contributor.authorWaree Tiyaboonchaien_US
dc.contributor.otherNaresuan Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-25T11:42:52Z
dc.date.available2020-08-25T11:42:52Z
dc.date.issued2020-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2020, © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. The oral delivery of amphotericin B (AmB) has remained a challenge due to its low solubility, permeability, and instability in gastric acidic pH. To solve these issues, herein, we reported a novel approach of using nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs) and NLCs coating with Eudragit®L100-55 (Eu-NLCs) for the oral delivery of AmB. This study aimed to compare their ability in protecting the drug from degradation in gastrointestinal fluids and permeation enhancement in Caco-2 cells. Uncoated NLCs and Eu-NLCs possessed a mean particle size of ∼180 and ∼550 nm, with a zeta potential of ∼−30 and ∼−50 mV, respectively. Both NLCs demonstrated an AmB entrapment efficiency up to ∼75%. They possessed significantly greater AmB water solubility than the free drug by up to 10-fold. In fasted state simulated gastric fluid, Eu-NLCs provided significantly greater AmB protection from acidic degradation than uncoated NLCs. In fasted state simulated intestinal fluid, both uncoated and Eu-NLCs showed a fast release characteristic. Caco-2 cells permeation studies revealed that uncoated NLCs provided significantly higher apparent permeation coefficient (P app) value than Eu-NLCs. Moreover, after 6 months of storage at 4 °C in the absence of light, the physicochemical stabilities of the lyophilized uncoated and Eu-NLCs could be maintained. In conclusion, the developed NLCs and Eu-NLCs could be a potential drug delivery system in improving the oral bioavailability of AmB.en_US
dc.identifier.citationDrug Delivery. Vol.27, No.1 (2020), 1054-1062en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/10717544.2020.1785050en_US
dc.identifier.issn15210464en_US
dc.identifier.issn10717544en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85087654603en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/58361
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85087654603&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceuticsen_US
dc.titleStrategies to enhance oral delivery of amphotericin B: a comparison of uncoated and enteric-coated nanostructured lipid carriersen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85087654603&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections