Publication: Strategies to enhance oral delivery of amphotericin B: a comparison of uncoated and enteric-coated nanostructured lipid carriers
dc.contributor.author | Pataranapa Nimtrakul | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Pakawadee Sermsappasuk | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Waree Tiyaboonchai | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | Naresuan University | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | Mahidol University | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-08-25T11:42:52Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-08-25T11:42:52Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-01-01 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | © 2020, © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. The oral delivery of amphotericin B (AmB) has remained a challenge due to its low solubility, permeability, and instability in gastric acidic pH. To solve these issues, herein, we reported a novel approach of using nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs) and NLCs coating with Eudragit®L100-55 (Eu-NLCs) for the oral delivery of AmB. This study aimed to compare their ability in protecting the drug from degradation in gastrointestinal fluids and permeation enhancement in Caco-2 cells. Uncoated NLCs and Eu-NLCs possessed a mean particle size of ∼180 and ∼550 nm, with a zeta potential of ∼−30 and ∼−50 mV, respectively. Both NLCs demonstrated an AmB entrapment efficiency up to ∼75%. They possessed significantly greater AmB water solubility than the free drug by up to 10-fold. In fasted state simulated gastric fluid, Eu-NLCs provided significantly greater AmB protection from acidic degradation than uncoated NLCs. In fasted state simulated intestinal fluid, both uncoated and Eu-NLCs showed a fast release characteristic. Caco-2 cells permeation studies revealed that uncoated NLCs provided significantly higher apparent permeation coefficient (P app) value than Eu-NLCs. Moreover, after 6 months of storage at 4 °C in the absence of light, the physicochemical stabilities of the lyophilized uncoated and Eu-NLCs could be maintained. In conclusion, the developed NLCs and Eu-NLCs could be a potential drug delivery system in improving the oral bioavailability of AmB. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Drug Delivery. Vol.27, No.1 (2020), 1054-1062 | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/10717544.2020.1785050 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 15210464 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 10717544 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | 2-s2.0-85087654603 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/58361 | |
dc.rights | Mahidol University | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | SCOPUS | en_US |
dc.source.uri | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85087654603&origin=inward | en_US |
dc.subject | Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics | en_US |
dc.title | Strategies to enhance oral delivery of amphotericin B: a comparison of uncoated and enteric-coated nanostructured lipid carriers | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
mu.datasource.scopus | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85087654603&origin=inward | en_US |