Publication:
Microbiological Profile and Antimicrobial Resistance in Burn Unit of Ramathibodi Hospital

dc.contributor.authorSuparerk Laohapitakwornen_US
dc.contributor.authorChonlada Krutsrien_US
dc.contributor.authorSuppachok Kirdlarpen_US
dc.contributor.authorPhurit Bovornchutichaien_US
dc.contributor.authorNapatsorn Wongwiriyaen_US
dc.contributor.authorNapat Rojsirikulchaien_US
dc.contributor.authorKidakorn Kiranantawaten_US
dc.contributor.authorChalermpong Chatdokmaipraien_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-04T08:58:41Z
dc.date.available2022-08-04T08:58:41Z
dc.date.issued2021-12-01en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Infection of burn patients remains a major challenge due to an immunocompromised state and prolonged hospitalization. Knowing bacteriology and antibiotic susceptibility would therefore facilitate tailored management of infection in the Burn Unit. Objective: To investigate microbiological profile and antimicrobial resistance in the Burn Unit, Ramathibodi Hospital. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review of patients admitted to the Burn Unit was conducted during a two-year period (June 2019 to May 2021). Demographic data of infected and non-infected patients were collected including percentage of total body surface area (%TBSA), number of operations, length of hospital stay, and mortality. Bacterial isolates were cultured from burn wounds and blood. Antibiotic resistant profile of all common pathogens was analyzed. Results: A total of 49 burn patients were included. There were 33 patients (67.3%) in the infected group and 16 patients (32.7%) in the non-infected group. Infected patients had larger burn sizes (25.5 vs. 4.0 %TBSA, p=0.001) and required more operations (4 vs. 0.5, p=0.008) and longer hospitalization (36 vs. 11.5 days, p<0.001). Nevertheless, mortality of both groups was not significantly different (9.1% vs. 0%, p=0.213). Of all 212 bacterial isolates, the common organisms from the wounds were Pseudomonas aeruginosa (25.0%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (20.8%), and Enterococcus faecalis (16.5%). The common pathogens from 16 isolates of hemocultures were coagulase-negative staphylococcus (12.5%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (12.5%), and Proteus mirabilis (12.5%). Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were two majority of multiple-drug resistant organisms (MDROs). These two strains were resistant to most antibiotics. However, colistin was still effective against the MDROs. Conclusion: The present study reviewed the prevalence of bacterial infection obtained from burn wounds and hemocultures to determine the bacteriological profile and antibiotic resistant patterns. This knowledge help improve decision making for appropriate antibiotic prescription in the Burn Unit.en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of the Medical Association of Thailand. Vol.104, No.12 (2021), S89-S97en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.35755/jmedassocthai.2021.S05.00084en_US
dc.identifier.issn01252208en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85122595092en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/77430
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85122595092&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleMicrobiological Profile and Antimicrobial Resistance in Burn Unit of Ramathibodi Hospitalen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85122595092&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections