Publication:
Reappraisal of Inflammatory Biomarkers in Heart Failure

dc.contributor.authorThanat Chaikijurajaien_US
dc.contributor.authorW. H.Wilson Tangen_US
dc.contributor.otherCleveland Clinic Foundationen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-27T03:36:31Z
dc.date.available2020-01-27T03:36:31Z
dc.date.issued2020-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2020, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature. Purpose of Review: Inflammation has been shown to be an important factor in the development and progression of heart failure (HF), regardless of the etiology. There have been many studies that demonstrated roles of inflammatory biomarkers in diagnosis, prognosis of chronic and acute HF patients, and also markers of cardiotoxicity from chemotherapy. These cytokines are high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), myeloperoxidase (MPO), soluble growth stimulation expressed gene 2 (sST2), interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFα), growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15), endothelin-1 (ET-1), and galectin-3. In this review, we discuss the past and present insights of those inflammatory biomarkers in order to gain more understanding in pathogenesis of HF, risk stratification of HF patients, and early detection of cardiotoxicity from cancer therapy. Recent Findings: Many inflammatory cytokines have been shown to be associated with mortality of both chronic and acute HF patients, and some of them are able to track treatment responses, especially sST2 and galectin-3, which are the only two inflammatory biomarkers recommended to use in clinical setting by the recent standard HF guidelines, while some studies described ET-1 and MPO as potential predictors of cardiotoxicity from cancer drugs. Summary: The prognostic implications of inflammatory biomarkers in HF patients have been demonstrated more consistently in chronic than acute HF, with some suggestions of ET-1 and MPO in patients receiving chemotherapy. However, further studies are necessary for the use of inflammatory biomarkers in routine clinical practice.en_US
dc.identifier.citationCurrent Heart Failure Reports. (2020)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11897-019-00450-1en_US
dc.identifier.issn15469549en_US
dc.identifier.issn15469530en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85077530881en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/49658
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85077530881&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleReappraisal of Inflammatory Biomarkers in Heart Failureen_US
dc.typeReviewen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85077530881&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections