Publication: The intercity bus passenger's locus of control with regard to seat belt use intention
Issued Date
2018-01-01
Resource Type
ISSN
25870009
0858849X
0858849X
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-85056199282
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Suranaree Journal of Science and Technology. Vol.25, No.3 (2018), 235-246
Suggested Citation
Watanya Nambulee, Sajjakaj Jomnonkwao, Siradol Siridhara, Vatanavongs Ratanavaraha, Ampol Karoonsoontawong, Roodheer Beeharry The intercity bus passenger's locus of control with regard to seat belt use intention. Suranaree Journal of Science and Technology. Vol.25, No.3 (2018), 235-246. Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/45854
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
The intercity bus passenger's locus of control with regard to seat belt use intention
Abstract
© 2006 Institute of Research and Development, Suranaree University of Technology. In Thailand, the number of accidents caused by intercity buses and their severity are increasing while the rate of seat belt use by intercity bus passengers is decreasing. This study aims to identify the factors affecting the seat belt use behavioural intention (BI) of intercity bus passengers. For analysis, the samples were divided into 2 groups: the teenage group (334 samples) and adult group (577 samples). The theory of locus of control (LC) was applied to analyse internality (IN) and externality (EX), which were both based on LC basic components. The theory was extended by additionally analysing factors that consist of knowledge of seat belt enforcement (EN) and past experience. Structural equation modelling was used to analyse the factors affecting seat belt use BI. Analysis results showed that the two models have differences and that all factors influenced the seat belt use BI of the 2 groups. For the teenage group, IN had the most positive influence on seat belt use BI, followed by past experience, EX, and EN (β = 0.369, 0.290, 0.240, and 0.190, respectively). For the adult group, the IN factor also had the most positive influence, followed by EX, EN, and past experience (β = 0.388, 0.273, 0.244, and 0.236, respectively). Thus, the factors obtained from the result analysis can be proposed to the government as guidelines for formulating policies or practical methods to encourage passengers to increasingly use seat belts while travelling.