Publication: Interobserver Agreement in the Interpretation of Single-Field Digital Fundus Images for Diabetic Retinopathy Screening
dc.contributor.author | Paisan Ruamviboonsuk | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Khemawan Teerasuwanajak | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Montip Tiensuwan | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Kanokwan Yuttitham | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | Rajavithi Hospital | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | Mahidol University | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-08-20T07:17:08Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-08-20T07:17:08Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2006-05-01 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose: To assess agreement among a group of ophthalmic care providers, including ophthalmologists and trained nonphysician personnel, in the interpretation of single-field digital fundus images for diabetic retinopathy screening. Design: Interobserver reliability study. Participants: Twelve ophthalmic care personnel, including 3 retina specialists, 3 general ophthalmologists, 3 ophthalmic nurses, and 3 ophthalmic photographers. Methods: All participants were to read 400 good single-field digital fundus images of diabetic patients from a community hospital. The nonphysician personnel group read the images 1 month after attending a 2-day intensive instruction course regarding diabetic retinopathy screening. The ophthalmologists read the images without additional training. The 3 retina specialists read the images again together 2 months later to form a consensus regarding retinopathy severity and macular edema for each case. All readers used the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study standard photographs as guidelines. Main Outcome Measures: The κ statistic was used for the reliability assessment of the diabetic retinopathy severity and macular edema, and for the identification of cases that needed referral to ophthalmologists. Results: There is only fair agreement among all readers. The multirater κ coefficient for retinopathy severity is 0.34; for macular edema, 0.27; and for referral cases, 0.28. Retina specialists have the best agreement among all groups (κ = 0.58 for retinopathy severity or macular edema, κ = 0.63 for referrals). There is also fair agreement when all readers are compared with the consensus of retina specialists (κs = 0.35, 0.28, and 0.29 for retinopathy severity, macular edema, and referrals, respectively), and the retina specialist group also has the best agreement (κs = 0.63, 0.65, and 0.67 for retinopathy severity, macular edema, and referrals). Conclusions: Without additional training, retina specialists may be the most reliable personnel to interpret single-field digital fundus images for diabetic retinopathy screening. For other ophthalmic care personnel to achieve comparable reliability, a comprehensive instruction course with specific continuing education is essential. Authorized nonphysician interpreters should be experts, and new standard photographs for single-field digital fundus image interpretation may also be required to improve interobserver reliability. © 2006 American Academy of Ophthalmology. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Ophthalmology. Vol.113, No.5 (2006), 826-832 | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.11.021 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 01616420 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | 2-s2.0-33646143524 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/23754 | |
dc.rights | Mahidol University | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | SCOPUS | en_US |
dc.source.uri | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=33646143524&origin=inward | en_US |
dc.subject | Medicine | en_US |
dc.title | Interobserver Agreement in the Interpretation of Single-Field Digital Fundus Images for Diabetic Retinopathy Screening | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
mu.datasource.scopus | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=33646143524&origin=inward | en_US |