Publication:
Interobserver Agreement in the Interpretation of Single-Field Digital Fundus Images for Diabetic Retinopathy Screening

dc.contributor.authorPaisan Ruamviboonsuken_US
dc.contributor.authorKhemawan Teerasuwanajaken_US
dc.contributor.authorMontip Tiensuwanen_US
dc.contributor.authorKanokwan Yuttithamen_US
dc.contributor.otherRajavithi Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-20T07:17:08Z
dc.date.available2018-08-20T07:17:08Z
dc.date.issued2006-05-01en_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To assess agreement among a group of ophthalmic care providers, including ophthalmologists and trained nonphysician personnel, in the interpretation of single-field digital fundus images for diabetic retinopathy screening. Design: Interobserver reliability study. Participants: Twelve ophthalmic care personnel, including 3 retina specialists, 3 general ophthalmologists, 3 ophthalmic nurses, and 3 ophthalmic photographers. Methods: All participants were to read 400 good single-field digital fundus images of diabetic patients from a community hospital. The nonphysician personnel group read the images 1 month after attending a 2-day intensive instruction course regarding diabetic retinopathy screening. The ophthalmologists read the images without additional training. The 3 retina specialists read the images again together 2 months later to form a consensus regarding retinopathy severity and macular edema for each case. All readers used the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study standard photographs as guidelines. Main Outcome Measures: The κ statistic was used for the reliability assessment of the diabetic retinopathy severity and macular edema, and for the identification of cases that needed referral to ophthalmologists. Results: There is only fair agreement among all readers. The multirater κ coefficient for retinopathy severity is 0.34; for macular edema, 0.27; and for referral cases, 0.28. Retina specialists have the best agreement among all groups (κ = 0.58 for retinopathy severity or macular edema, κ = 0.63 for referrals). There is also fair agreement when all readers are compared with the consensus of retina specialists (κs = 0.35, 0.28, and 0.29 for retinopathy severity, macular edema, and referrals, respectively), and the retina specialist group also has the best agreement (κs = 0.63, 0.65, and 0.67 for retinopathy severity, macular edema, and referrals). Conclusions: Without additional training, retina specialists may be the most reliable personnel to interpret single-field digital fundus images for diabetic retinopathy screening. For other ophthalmic care personnel to achieve comparable reliability, a comprehensive instruction course with specific continuing education is essential. Authorized nonphysician interpreters should be experts, and new standard photographs for single-field digital fundus image interpretation may also be required to improve interobserver reliability. © 2006 American Academy of Ophthalmology.en_US
dc.identifier.citationOphthalmology. Vol.113, No.5 (2006), 826-832en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.11.021en_US
dc.identifier.issn01616420en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-33646143524en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/23754
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=33646143524&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleInterobserver Agreement in the Interpretation of Single-Field Digital Fundus Images for Diabetic Retinopathy Screeningen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=33646143524&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections