Publication:
The Efficacy of Two Different Concentrations of Local Anaesthetic on Pain in Mandibular Third Molar Surgery

dc.contributor.authorThippayarat Piernonen_US
dc.contributor.authorBasel Mahardawien_US
dc.contributor.authorKumar KCen_US
dc.contributor.authorChakorn Vorakulpipaten_US
dc.contributor.authorBishwa Prakash Bhattaraien_US
dc.contributor.authorNatthamet Wongsirichaten_US
dc.contributor.otherWalailak Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-03T06:40:58Z
dc.date.available2021-02-03T06:40:58Z
dc.date.issued2020-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstracthttp://aos.usm.my/ © Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia. 2020 Mepivacaine is a common local anaesthetic used with claims of a high safety profile. There are two commercial types, 2% mepivacaine with vasoconstrictor and 3% without vasoconstrictor. There are many suggestions regarding the usage of plain 3% without vasoconstrictor for systemic medical problems, however, there have not been any previous studies to confirm this necessity in impacted lower third molar surgery (ILTMS). This study aims to evaluate the anaesthetic efficiency and the effect on the patient of 2% and 3% mepivacaine, adding vasoconstrictor to the 3% mepivacaine. This crossover study comprised of 24 patients with bilateral, symmetrically positioned, impacted lower third molars. Patients received either 2% or 3% mepivacaine for the inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB). Onset and duration of anaesthesia, and haemodynamic considerations were analysed as primary outcomes. Furthermore, pain, duration of postoperative anaesthesia and pulp vitality were analysed as secondary outcomes. Different concentrations of mepivacaine showed similar anaesthetic onset time (p > 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference regarding the duration of anaesthesia, as well as the postoperative analgesia (p > 0.05). The two concentrations did not lead to any haemodynamic changes or complications during ILTMS. Thus, adding the vasoconstrictor to mepivacaine 3% did not cause any adverse effects on the patients intra or postoperatively. Therefore, it is possible for dentists to use only 2% mepivacaine with vasoconstrictor for IANB effectively and safely when the case necessitates the need for a vasoconstrictor, or in other words, longer duration of haemostasis.en_US
dc.identifier.citationArchives of Orofacial Sciences. Vol.15, No.2 (2020), 159-173en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.21315/AOS2020.15.2.455en_US
dc.identifier.issn22317163en_US
dc.identifier.issn18238602en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85099154278en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/60922
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85099154278&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectDentistryen_US
dc.titleThe Efficacy of Two Different Concentrations of Local Anaesthetic on Pain in Mandibular Third Molar Surgeryen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85099154278&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections