Publication:
Comparison of two commercial ELISA kits for the detection of anti-dengue IgM for routine dengue diagnosis in Laos

dc.contributor.authorYixiao Luen_US
dc.contributor.authorOnanong Sengvilaipaseuthen_US
dc.contributor.authorAnisone Chanthongthipen_US
dc.contributor.authorOoyanong Phonemixayen_US
dc.contributor.authorManivanh Vongsouvathen_US
dc.contributor.authorPhonelavanh Phouminhen_US
dc.contributor.authorStuart D. Blacksellen_US
dc.contributor.authorPaul N. Newtonen_US
dc.contributor.authorAudrey Dubot-Pérèsen_US
dc.contributor.otherAix Marseille Universitéen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherNagasaki Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherNuffield Department of Clinical Medicineen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahosot Hospitalen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-27T08:55:34Z
dc.date.available2020-01-27T08:55:34Z
dc.date.issued2019-07-25en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2019 by the authors. The endemicity of Dengue virus (DENV) infection remains a major public health problem in Lao PDR. In this study, we compared two commercial anti-dengue IgM ELISA kits, Panbio® Dengue IgM Capture ELISA (Panbio Kit, Alere, Waltham, MA, USA) and DEN DetectTM MAC-ELISA (InBios kit, InBios International, Inc., Seattle, WA, USA), in the context of diagnosis of patients admitted to hospital with clinical dengue presentation. Two panels of paired blood samples were tested. Panel A was composed of 54 dengue confirmed patients (by DENV real-time RT-PCR) and 11 non-dengue dengue patients (other infections confirmed by corresponding PCR results). Panel B included 74 patients randomly selected from consecutive patients admitted to Mahosot Hospital in 2008 with suspicion of dengue fever according to WHO criteria. Results from panel A showed significantly better sensitivity for Panbio kit (64.8%; 95%CI: 50.6-77.3%) than for InBios kit (18.5%; 95%CI: 9.3-31.4%) when testing admission sera. Sensitivity was increased for both kits when combining results from admission and convalescent sera. Concordant results were obtained from panel B with fair agreement (κ = 0.29) between both kits when testing single admission samples, and moderate agreement (κ = 0.5) when combining results from admission and convalescent sera.en_US
dc.identifier.citationTropical Medicine and Infectious Disease. Vol.4, No.3 (2019)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/tropicalmed4030111en_US
dc.identifier.issn24146366en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85072112296en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/51039
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85072112296&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectImmunology and Microbiologyen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleComparison of two commercial ELISA kits for the detection of anti-dengue IgM for routine dengue diagnosis in Laosen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85072112296&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections