Publication: Systematic review of statistical methods for safety data in malaria chemoprevention in pregnancy trials
Issued Date
2020-03-20
Resource Type
ISSN
14752875
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-85082146529
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Malaria Journal. Vol.19, No.1 (2020)
Suggested Citation
Noel Patson, Mavuto Mukaka, Kennedy N. Otwombe, Lawrence Kazembe, Don P. Mathanga, Victor Mwapasa, Alinune N. Kabaghe, Marinus J.C. Eijkemans, Miriam K. Laufer, Tobias Chirwa Systematic review of statistical methods for safety data in malaria chemoprevention in pregnancy trials. Malaria Journal. Vol.19, No.1 (2020). doi:10.1186/s12936-020-03190-z Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/54575
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
Systematic review of statistical methods for safety data in malaria chemoprevention in pregnancy trials
Abstract
© 2020 The Author(s). Background: Drug safety assessments in clinical trials present unique analytical challenges. Some of these include adjusting for individual follow-up time, repeated measurements of multiple outcomes and missing data among others. Furthermore, pre-specifying appropriate analysis becomes difficult as some safety endpoints are unexpected. Although existing guidelines such as CONSORT encourage thorough reporting of adverse events (AEs) in clinical trials, they provide limited details for safety data analysis. The limited guidelines may influence suboptimal analysis by failing to account for some analysis challenges above. A typical example where such challenges exist are trials of anti-malarial drugs for malaria prevention during pregnancy. Lack of proper standardized evaluation of the safety of antimalarial drugs has limited the ability to draw conclusions about safety. Therefore, a systematic review was conducted to establish the current practice in statistical analysis for preventive antimalarial drug safety in pregnancy. Methods: The search included five databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Malaria in Pregnancy Library and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) to identify original English articles reporting Phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on anti-malarial drugs for malaria prevention in pregnancy published from January 2010 to July 2019. Results: Eighteen trials were included in this review that collected multiple longitudinal safety outcomes including AEs. Statistical analysis and reporting of the safety outcomes in all the trials used descriptive statistics; proportions/counts (n = 18, 100%) and mean/median (n = 2, 11.1%). Results presentation included tabular (n = 16, 88.9%) and text description (n = 2, 11.1%). Univariate inferential methods were reported in most trials (n = 16, 88.9%); including Chi square/Fisher's exact test (n = 12, 66.7%), t test (n = 2, 11.1%) and Mann-Whitney/Wilcoxon test (n = 1, 5.6%). Multivariable methods, including Poisson and negative binomial were reported in few trials (n = 3, 16.7%). Assessment of a potential link between missing efficacy data and safety outcomes was not reported in any of the trials that reported efficacy missing data (n = 7, 38.9%). Conclusion: The review demonstrated that statistical analysis of safety data in anti-malarial drugs for malarial chemoprevention in pregnancy RCTs is inadequate. The analyses insufficiently account for multiple safety outcomes potential dependence, follow-up time and informative missing data which can compromise anti-malarial drug safety evidence development, based on the available data.