Publication: Comparative efficacy of interventions to promote hand hygiene in hospital: Systematic review and network meta-analysis
2
Issued Date
2015-07-28
Resource Type
ISSN
17561833
09598146
09598146
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-84941695188
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
BMJ (Online). Vol.351, (2015)
Suggested Citation
Nantasit Luangasanatip, Maliwan Hongsuwan, Direk Limmathurotsakul, Yoel Lubell, Andie S. Lee, Stephan Harbarth, Nicholas P.J. Day, Nicholas Graves, Ben S. Cooper Comparative efficacy of interventions to promote hand hygiene in hospital: Systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ (Online). Vol.351, (2015). doi:10.1136/bmj.h3728 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/36373
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
Comparative efficacy of interventions to promote hand hygiene in hospital: Systematic review and network meta-analysis
Abstract
© 2015 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. Objective To evaluate the relative efficacy of the World Health Organization 2005 campaign (WHO-5) and other interventions to promote hand hygiene among healthcare workers in hospital settings and to summarize associated information on use of resources. Design Systematic review and network meta-analysis. Data sources Medline, Embase, CINAHL, NHS Economic Evaluation Database, NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, Cochrane Library, and the EPOC register (December 2009 to February 2014); studies selected by the same search terms in previous systematic reviews (1980-2009). Review methods Included studies were randomised controlled trials, non-randomised trials, controlled before-after trials, and interrupted time series studies implementing an intervention to improve compliance with hand hygiene among healthcare workers in hospital settings and measuring compliance or appropriate proxies that met predefined quality inclusion criteria. When studies had not used appropriate analytical methods, primary data were re-analysed. Random effects and network meta-analyses were performed on studies reporting directly observed compliance with hand hygiene when they were considered sufficiently homogeneous with regard to interventions and participants. Information on resources required for interventions was extracted and graded into three levels. Results Of 3639 studies retrieved, 41 met the inclusion criteria (six randomised controlled trials, 32 interrupted time series, one non-randomised trial, and two controlled before-after studies). Meta-analysis of two randomised controlled trials showed the addition of goal setting to WHO-5 was associated with improved compliance (pooled odds ratio 1.35, 95% confidence interval 1.04 to 1.76; I2=81%). Of 22 pairwise comparisons from interrupted time series, 18 showed stepwise increases in compliance with hand hygiene, and all but four showed a trend for increasing compliance after the intervention. Network meta-analysis indicated considerable uncertainty in the relative effectiveness of interventions, but nonetheless provided evidence that WHO-5 is effective and that compliance can be further improved by adding interventions including goal setting, reward incentives, and accountability. Nineteen studies reported clinical outcomes; data from these were consistent with clinically important reductions in rates of infection resulting from improved hand hygiene for some but not all important hospital pathogens. Reported costs of interventions ranged from $225 to $4669 (£146-£3035; €204- €4229) per 1000 bed days. Conclusion Promotion of hand hygiene with WHO-5 is effective at increasing compliance in healthcare workers. Addition of goal setting, reward incentives, and accountability strategies can lead to further improvements. Reporting of resources required for such interventions remains inadequate.