Publication:
Detection and differentiation of yellow head complex viruses using monoclonal antibodies

dc.contributor.authorChumporn Soowannayanen_US
dc.contributor.authorTimothy W. Flegelen_US
dc.contributor.authorPaisarn Sithigorngulen_US
dc.contributor.authorJoanne Slateren_US
dc.contributor.authorAlexander Hyatten_US
dc.contributor.authorSandy Cramerrien_US
dc.contributor.authorTerry Wiseen_US
dc.contributor.authorMark St J. Craneen_US
dc.contributor.authorJeff A. Cowleyen_US
dc.contributor.authorRussell J. McCullochen_US
dc.contributor.authorPeter J. Walkeren_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherSrinakharinwirot Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherCSIRO Livestock Industriesen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-24T03:17:16Z
dc.date.available2018-07-24T03:17:16Z
dc.date.issued2003-12-29en_US
dc.description.abstractThree monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) raised against pathogenic yellow head virus (YHV) from Thailand were tested against tissues of shrimp from Thailand, Australia, Ecuador and India that were purported to be infected with yellow head complex viruses. MAbs V-3-2B and Y-18 were specific to gp116 and gp64 envelope proteins, respectively, while Y-19 was specific to a 20 kDa putative nucleoprotein p20. As a preliminary step, the site of reactivity of the 3 MAbs in YHV was determined by immuno-electron microscopy using ultra-thin sections of YHV-infected shrimp tissue and negatively stained, semi-purified YHV particles. As expected, MAb Y-19 reacted with viral nucleocapsids in ultra-thin sections but not with negatively stained, whole virions; MAb V-3-2B did react with negatively stained, whole virions, but not with virions or nucleocapsids in ultra-thin sections. Unexpectedly, MAb Y-18 did not react with whole or sectioned virions. By immunohistochemistry, MAbs Y-19 and Y-18 reacted with Penaeus monodon tissues infected with either YHV or with gill-associated virus (GAV) from Australia, while MAb V-3-2B reacted with YHV only. In addition, all the YHV and GAV tissue samples gave positive in situ hybridization reactions with a cDNA probe specific to the ORF1b gene of YHV. They also gave expected differential RT-PCR results for YHV and GAV. By contrast, 2 natural Thai shrimp specimens with no gross signs of disease gave similar immunohistochemical reactions and RT-PCR reactions to GAV. However, sequencing of their RT-PCR products showed that they shared 92.7% identity with GAV, but only 79.0% identity with YHV. Although specimens from Ecuador and India displayed histopathology suggestive of YHV infection, they gave negative immunohistochemical reactions with all 3 Mabs, and negative in situ hybridization results. Additional work is required to determine whether a virus from the yellow head complex was responsible for their observed histopathology. These data show that the 3 YHV MAbs could be used in diagnostic situations to differentiate some viruses in the yellow head virus complex.en_US
dc.identifier.citationDiseases of Aquatic Organisms. Vol.57, No.3 (2003), 193-200en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3354/dao057193en_US
dc.identifier.issn01775103en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-1442342064en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/20603
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=1442342064&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectAgricultural and Biological Sciencesen_US
dc.titleDetection and differentiation of yellow head complex viruses using monoclonal antibodiesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=1442342064&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections