Publication: A comparison of the bacterial culture results of maxillary sinus mucosa and pus collections for chronic maxillary rhinosinusitis
Issued Date
2019-01-01
Resource Type
ISSN
22288082
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-85064464744
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Siriraj Medical Journal. Vol.71, No.2 (2019), 95-101
Suggested Citation
Anan Bedavanija, Pongsakorn Tantilipikorn, Chetta Banditsing, Pattarachai Kiratisin, Chaweewan Bunnag A comparison of the bacterial culture results of maxillary sinus mucosa and pus collections for chronic maxillary rhinosinusitis. Siriraj Medical Journal. Vol.71, No.2 (2019), 95-101. doi:10.33192/Smj.2019.15 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/52268
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
A comparison of the bacterial culture results of maxillary sinus mucosa and pus collections for chronic maxillary rhinosinusitis
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
© 2019 Siriraj Medical Journal. Objective: Although maxillary antral taps are the standard for collecting pus for bacterial culture, they sometimes reveal no growth. Intraoperative mucosal cultures are another method to collect pathogen samples. This study compared aerobic bacterial cultures from maxillary sinus mucosa and pus collected from chronic maxillary rhinosinusitis patients. Methods: A prospective study of 22 chronic maxillary rhinosinusitis patients was conducted. Antral pus and mucosa collected during endoscopic sinus surgery were immediately sent to a microbiological laboratory. The degree of concordance between maxillary sinus mucosa aerobic bacterial cultures and pus cultures was then analyzed. Results: Twenty-seven specimens were obtained for the cultures. The proportions of positive mucosal and pus cultures were 40.74% and 51.85%, respectively. The common aerobic pathogens from the two culture techniques were Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. A concordance between the pus and mucosal cultures was demonstrated by 19 out of 27 specimens (70.37%). Compared with the pus cultures, the mucosal cultures had a specificity of 84.62% (95% CI, 54.55%-98.08%), a sensitivity of 57.14% (95% CI, 28.86%-82.34%), a predictive value of a positive result of 80% (95% CI, 50.83%-93.93%), and a predictive value of a negative result of 64.71% (95% CI, 48.96%-77.80%). Conclusion: Similar pathogenic bacteria were recovered from the mucosa and pus. Given the high degree of similarity of the bacteria found, the good concordance rate, and the high specificity and positive predictive value of the mucosal cultures compared with the pus cultures, mucosal cultures should be a reference standard and an option when pus is unavailable, especially with immunocompromised patients.