Publication:
Comparing a social and communication app, telephone intervention, and usual care for diabetes self-management: 3-Arm quasiexperimental evaluation study

dc.contributor.authorChing Ju Chiuen_US
dc.contributor.authorYung Chen Yuen_US
dc.contributor.authorYe Fong Duen_US
dc.contributor.authorYi Ching Yangen_US
dc.contributor.authorJou Yin Chenen_US
dc.contributor.authorLi Ping Wongen_US
dc.contributor.authorChanuantong Tanasugarnen_US
dc.contributor.otherNational Cheng Kung University Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Malayaen_US
dc.contributor.otherNational Cheng Kung Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-25T11:21:54Z
dc.date.available2020-08-25T11:21:54Z
dc.date.issued2020-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2020 Ching-Ju Chiu, Yung-Chen Yu, Ye-Fong Du, Yi-Ching Yang, Jou-Yin Chen, Li-Ping Wong, Chanuantong Tanasugarn. Background: Many technology-assisted innovations have been used to manage disease. However, most of these innovations are not broadly used by older adults due to their cost. Additionally, disease management through technology-assisted innovations has not been compared with other interventions. Objective: In this study, we tested the employment of a free and widely used social and communication app to help older adults with diabetes manage their distress and glycemic control. We also compared the effectiveness of the app with 2 other methods, namely telephone and conventional health education, and determined which subgroup experiences the most effects within each intervention. Methods: Adults aged ≥50 years with type 2 diabetes were recruited from Southern Taiwan (N=231) and were allocated to different 3-month interventions. Informed consent was obtained at the Ministry of Science and Technology and approved by the National Cheng Kung University Hospital Institutional Review Board (No. A-ER-102-425). Results: Participants in the mobile-based group had significant reductions in hemoglobin A1c compared with the telephone-based and usual care groups (mean changes of -0.4%, 0.1%, and 0.03%, respectively; P=.02). Diabetes-specific distress decreased to a greater extent in the mobile-based group compared to the other 2 groups (mean changes of -5.16, -3.49, and -2.44, respectively, P=.02). Subgroup analyses further revealed that the effects on reducing blood glucose levels in the social and communication app groups were especially evident in patients with lower distress scores, and diabetes-related distress was especially evident in participants who were younger than 60 years or had higher educational levels. Conclusions: The findings of this study inform more flexible use of social and communication apps with in-person diabetes education and counselling.en_US
dc.identifier.citationJMIR mHealth and uHealth. Vol.8, No.6 (2020)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.2196/14024en_US
dc.identifier.issn22915222en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85085904615en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/58307
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85085904615&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleComparing a social and communication app, telephone intervention, and usual care for diabetes self-management: 3-Arm quasiexperimental evaluation studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85085904615&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections