Publication:
Factors associated with recurrent postinfarction ventricular tachycardia following ablation

dc.contributor.authorJakrin KeWCHaroenen_US
dc.contributor.authorNarut Prasitlumkumen_US
dc.contributor.authorSittinop TiTiCHoaTraTTanaen_US
dc.contributor.authorChutikarn Wittayalikiten_US
dc.contributor.authorAngkawipa Trongtorsaken_US
dc.contributor.authorChanavuth Kanitsoraphanen_US
dc.contributor.authorPrapaipan Putthapibanen_US
dc.contributor.authorKittika Poonsombudlerten_US
dc.contributor.authorPattara raTTanaWongen_US
dc.contributor.authoreugene H. CHUngen_US
dc.contributor.otherRamathibodi Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Michigan Medical Schoolen_US
dc.contributor.otherChulalongkorn Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherAlbert Einstein Healthcare Networken_US
dc.contributor.otherMayo Clinic Scottsdale-Phoenix, Arizonaen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Hawaiʻi at Mānoaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-04T11:01:03Z
dc.date.available2022-08-04T11:01:03Z
dc.date.issued2021-02-01en_US
dc.description.abstractinTrodUCTion: ablation of ventricular tachycardia is the main therapy for patients with drug-refractory ventricular tachycardia (vT). although evidence suggests that vT ablation could lower the incidence of recurrent vT, many cases still develop vT in follow-up. in this study, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine risk factors for recurrent vT in patients with postinfarction vT who underwent vT ablation. evidenCe aCQUiSiTion: We comprehensively searched the databases of Medline and eMBaSe from inception to March 2020. included studies were cohort studies, experimental trials, or randomized controlled trials that evaluate the risk of recurrent vT in postinfarction vT patients who underwent vT ablation. data from each study were combined using random-effects. evidenCe SynTHeSiS: Thirteen studies involving 1803 postinfarction patients who underwent vT ablation were included. inducibility after the procedure (pooled Hr=1.71, P<0.001), lower baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (pooled HR=0.98, P<0.001) and higher baseline New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification (pooled HR=1.34, P=0.003) were significantly associated with VT recurrence during the follow-up. There was no significant association between age, gender or diabetes mellitus and vT recurrence. ConClUSionS: our meta-analysis demonstrated that inducibility after the procedure, lower baseline lveF and higher baseline NYHA classification were associated with an increased risk of VT recurrence in postinfarction VT patients who underwent vT ablation.en_US
dc.identifier.citationMinerva Cardiology and Angiology. Vol.69, No.1 (2021), 50-60en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.23736/S2724-5683.20.05128-2en_US
dc.identifier.issn27245772en_US
dc.identifier.issn27245683en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85105520120en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/78457
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85105520120&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleFactors associated with recurrent postinfarction ventricular tachycardia following ablationen_US
dc.typeReviewen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85105520120&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections