Publication:
Volumetric analysis of intracranial arteriovenous malformations contoured for cyberknife radiosurgery with 3-dimensional rotational angiography vs computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging

dc.contributor.authorAnand Veeravaguen_US
dc.contributor.authorAke Hansasutaen_US
dc.contributor.authorBowen Jiangen_US
dc.contributor.authorAftab S. Karimen_US
dc.contributor.authorIris C. Gibbsen_US
dc.contributor.authorSteven D. Changen_US
dc.contributor.otherStanford Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherStanford University School of Medicineen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-19T05:19:47Z
dc.date.available2018-10-19T05:19:47Z
dc.date.issued2013-08-01en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Accurate target delineation has significant impact on brain arteriovenous malformation (AVM) obliteration, treatment success, and potential complications of stereotactic radiosurgery. Objective: We compare the nidal contouring of AVMs using fused images of contrasted computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with matched images of 3-dimensional (3-D) cerebral angiography for CyberKnife radiosurgery (CKRS) treatment planning. Methods: Between May 2009 and April 2012, 3-D cerebral angiography was integrated into CKRS target planning for 30 consecutive patients. The AVM nidal target volumes were delineated using fused CT and MRI scans vs fused CT, MRI, and 3-D cerebral angiography for each patient. Results: The mean volume of the AVM nidus contoured with the addition of 3-D cerebral angiography to the CT/MRI fusion (9.09 cm3, 95% confidence interval: 5.39 cm3-12.8 cm3) was statistically smaller than the mean volume contoured with CT/MRI fused scans alone (14.1 cm3, 95% confidence interval: 9.16 cm3-19.1 cm3), with a mean volume difference of σ = 5.01 cm3(P =.001). Diffuse AVM nidus was associated with larger mean volume differences compared with a compact nidus (σ = 6.51 vs 2.11 cm3, P =.02). The mean volume difference was not statistically associated with the patient's sex (male σ = 5.61, female σ = 5.06, σ =.84), previous hemorrhage status (yes σ = 5.69, no σ = 5.23, P =.86), or previous embolization status (yes σ = 6.80, no σ = 5.95, P =.11). Conclusion: For brain AVMs treated with CKRS, the addition of 3-D cerebral angiography to CT/MRI fusions for diagnostic accuracy results in a statistically significant reduction in contoured nidal volume compared with standard CT/MRI fusion-based contouring. Copyright © 2013 by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons.en_US
dc.identifier.citationNeurosurgery. Vol.73, No.2 (2013), 262-270en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1227/01.neu.0000430285.00928.30en_US
dc.identifier.issn0148396Xen_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84880920206en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/32231
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84880920206&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleVolumetric analysis of intracranial arteriovenous malformations contoured for cyberknife radiosurgery with 3-dimensional rotational angiography vs computed tomography/magnetic resonance imagingen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84880920206&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections