Publication:
Optimization and Standardization of Thermal Treatment as a Plasma Prefractionation Method for Proteomic Analysis

dc.contributor.authorWararat Chiangjongen_US
dc.contributor.authorChannarong Changtongen_US
dc.contributor.authorJirawan Panachanen_US
dc.contributor.authorChurat Weeraphanen_US
dc.contributor.authorChantragan Srisomsapen_US
dc.contributor.authorSuradej Hongengen_US
dc.contributor.authorJisnuson Svastien_US
dc.contributor.authorSomchai Chutipongtanateen_US
dc.contributor.otherChulabhorn Research Instituteen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherPrince of Songkla Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherChulabhorn Graduate Instituteen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-27T07:58:26Z
dc.date.available2020-01-27T07:58:26Z
dc.date.issued2019-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2019 Wararat Chiangjong et al. Prefractionation is a prerequisite step for deep plasma proteomics. Highly abundant proteins, particularly human serum albumin (HSA) and immunoglobulin G (IgG), typically interfere with investigation of proteins with lower abundance. A relatively simple preparation method based on high temperature can precipitate thermolabile proteins, providing a strategic window to access the thermostable plasma subproteome. This study aimed to optimize thermal treatment as a reliable prefractionation method and to compare it with two commercial kits, including HSA and IgG immunodepletion (IMDP) and combinatorial peptide ligand libraries (CPLL), using untreated plasma as a control condition. By varying the temperature and the incubation period, the optimal condition was found as treatment at 95°C for 20 min, which maintained about 1% recovery yield of soluble proteins. Consistency and reproducibility of thermal treatment-derived plasma subproteome were checked by two-dimensional electrophoresis. The coefficient of variation regarding protein spot numbers was less than 10% among three independent specimens. Highly abundant protein depletion of the thermal treatment was evaluated by immunoblotting against HSA and IgG as compared to the untreated plasma, IMDP, and CPLL. Multidimensional comparison based on 489 unique peptides derived from the label-free quantitative mass spectrometry revealed that the thermal treatment, IMDP, and CPLL provided distinct sets of plasma subproteome compared to untreated plasma, and these appeared to be complementary to each other. Comparing the characteristics of the three procedures suggested that thermal treatment was more cost-effective and less time-consuming than IMDP and CPLL. This study proposes the use of thermal treatment as a reliable and cost-effective method for plasma prefractionation which provides benefits to large-scale proteomic projects and biomarker studies.en_US
dc.identifier.citationBioMed Research International. Vol.2019, (2019)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1155/2019/8646039en_US
dc.identifier.issn23146141en_US
dc.identifier.issn23146133en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85066070161en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/50392
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85066070161&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biologyen_US
dc.subjectImmunology and Microbiologyen_US
dc.titleOptimization and Standardization of Thermal Treatment as a Plasma Prefractionation Method for Proteomic Analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85066070161&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections