Publication:
Obesity and Risk of Small Intestine Bacterial Overgrowth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

dc.contributor.authorKarn Wijarnpreechaen_US
dc.contributor.authorMonia E. Werlangen_US
dc.contributor.authorKanramon Watthanasuntornen_US
dc.contributor.authorPanadeekarn Panjawatananen_US
dc.contributor.authorWisit Cheungpasitpornen_US
dc.contributor.authorVictoria Gomezen_US
dc.contributor.authorFrank J. Lukensen_US
dc.contributor.authorPatompong Ungpraserten_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Mississippi Medical Centeren_US
dc.contributor.otherMayo Clinic in Jacksonville, Floridaen_US
dc.contributor.otherBassett Medical Centeren_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-27T07:58:11Z
dc.date.available2020-01-27T07:58:11Z
dc.date.issued2019-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2019, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature. Background/Objectives: Recent studies have proposed that obesity may be associated with a higher risk of small intestine bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) although the results were inconsistent. The microbiome has a known metabolic role; its impact on obesity in animal models generated the hypothesis of an association between a dysfunctional microbiome and obesity. We performed this systematic review and meta-analysis to elucidate this possible association by summarizing all available data. Methods: A literature search utilizing MEDLINE and EMBASE databases from inception until August 2019 was conducted. Eligible studies included either cohort studies or cross-sectional studies that consisted of two groups of participants, those with obesity and those without obesity, and compared the prevalence of SIBO between the groups. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) from each study were consolidated by the generic inverse variance method of DerSimonian and Laird. Results: A total of five studies with 515 patients fulfilled eligibility criteria and were included in this meta-analysis. The risk of SIBO among individuals with obesity was higher than in individuals without obesity but did not reach statistical significance with a pooled OR of 2.08 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.82–5.31; p = 0.12; I2 84%]. Sensitivity analysis including only studies from Western countries increased the pooled OR to 3.41 and reached statistical significance (95% CI 1.21–9.59; p = 0.02; I2 62%). Conclusions: This meta-analysis found that the risk of SIBO was about two times higher among individuals with obesity compared to individuals without obesity, although the result did not reach statistical significance. The risk increased to threefold and reached statistical significance when only studies from Western countries were included. These observations may suggest the role of obesity as a predisposing factor for SIBO although more studies are still needed to corroborate these preliminary results.en_US
dc.identifier.citationDigestive Diseases and Sciences. (2019)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10620-019-05887-xen_US
dc.identifier.issn15732568en_US
dc.identifier.issn01632116en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85074469122en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/50389
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85074469122&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biologyen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleObesity and Risk of Small Intestine Bacterial Overgrowth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85074469122&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections