Publication:
Residual macrovascular risk in 2013: What have we learned?

dc.contributor.authorJean Charles Frucharten_US
dc.contributor.authorJean Davignonen_US
dc.contributor.authorMichel P. Hermansen_US
dc.contributor.authorKhalid Al-Rubeaanen_US
dc.contributor.authorPierre Amarencoen_US
dc.contributor.authorGerd Assmannen_US
dc.contributor.authorPhilip Barteren_US
dc.contributor.authorJohn Betteridgeen_US
dc.contributor.authorEric Bruckerten_US
dc.contributor.authorAda Cuevasen_US
dc.contributor.authorMichel Farnieren_US
dc.contributor.authorEle Ferranninien_US
dc.contributor.authorPaola Fiorettoen_US
dc.contributor.authorJacques Genesten_US
dc.contributor.authorHenry N. Ginsbergen_US
dc.contributor.authorAntonio M. Gottoen_US
dc.contributor.authorDayi Huen_US
dc.contributor.authorTakashi Kadowakien_US
dc.contributor.authorTatsuhiko Kodamaen_US
dc.contributor.authorMichel Krempfen_US
dc.contributor.authorYuji Matsuzawaen_US
dc.contributor.authorJesús M. Núñez-Cortésen_US
dc.contributor.authorCarlos C. Monfilen_US
dc.contributor.authorHisao Ogawaen_US
dc.contributor.authorJorge Plutzkyen_US
dc.contributor.authorDaniel J. Raderen_US
dc.contributor.authorShaukat Sadikoten_US
dc.contributor.authorRaul D. Santosen_US
dc.contributor.authorEvgeny Shlyakhtoen_US
dc.contributor.authorPiyamitr Sritaraen_US
dc.contributor.authorRody Syen_US
dc.contributor.authorAlan Tallen_US
dc.contributor.authorChee E. Tanen_US
dc.contributor.authorLale Tokgözoǧluen_US
dc.contributor.authorPeter P. Tothen_US
dc.contributor.authorPaul Valensien_US
dc.contributor.authorChristoph Wanneren_US
dc.contributor.authorAlberto Zambonen_US
dc.contributor.authorJunren Zhuen_US
dc.contributor.authorPaul Zimmeten_US
dc.contributor.otherR3i Foundationen_US
dc.contributor.otherFondation coeur et arteresen_US
dc.contributor.otherInstitut de Recherches Cliniques de Montrealen_US
dc.contributor.otherCliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brusselsen_US
dc.contributor.otherKing Saud Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherHopital Bichat-Claude-Bernard AP-HPen_US
dc.contributor.otherAssmann-Stiftung für Präventionen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of New South Wales (UNSW) Australiaen_US
dc.contributor.otherUCLen_US
dc.contributor.otherHopital Universitaire Pitie Salpetriereen_US
dc.contributor.otherClinica Las Condesen_US
dc.contributor.otherPoint Medicalen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversita di Pisaen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversita degli Studi di Padovaen_US
dc.contributor.otherMcGill University Health Centre, Royal Victoria Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherColumbia University in the City of New Yorken_US
dc.contributor.otherWeill Cornell Medical Collegeen_US
dc.contributor.otherPeking Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Tokyoen_US
dc.contributor.otherCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantesen_US
dc.contributor.otherOsaka Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherHospital General Universitario Gregorio Maranonen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Concepcionen_US
dc.contributor.otherKumamoto Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherBrigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical Schoolen_US
dc.contributor.otherPenn Cardiovascular Instituteen_US
dc.contributor.otherJaslok Hospital and Research Centreen_US
dc.contributor.otherInstituto do Coracao do Hospital das Clinicasen_US
dc.contributor.otherAlmazov National Medical Research Centreen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of the Philippines Manilaen_US
dc.contributor.otherColumbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeonsen_US
dc.contributor.otherGleneagles Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherHacettepe Universitesien_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Illinoisen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversite Paris 13en_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversitatsklinikum Wurzburgen_US
dc.contributor.otherFudan Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherBaker Heart and Diabetes Instituteen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-09T02:41:26Z
dc.date.available2018-11-09T02:41:26Z
dc.date.issued2014-01-24en_US
dc.description.abstractCardiovascular disease poses a major challenge for the 21st century, exacerbated by the pandemics of obesity, metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes. While best standards of care, including high-dose statins, can ameliorate the risk of vascular complications, patients remain at high risk of cardiovascular events. The Residual Risk Reduction Initiative (R3i) has previously highlighted atherogenic dyslipidaemia, defined as the imbalance between proatherogenic triglyceride-rich apolipoprotein B-containing-lipoproteins and antiatherogenic apolipoprotein A-I-lipoproteins (as in high-density lipoprotein, HDL), as an important modifiable contributor to lipid-related residual cardiovascular risk, especially in insulin-resistant conditions. As part of its mission to improve awareness and clinical management of atherogenic dyslipidaemia, the R3i has identified three key priorities for action: i) to improve recognition of atherogenic dyslipidaemia in patients at high cardiometabolic risk with or without diabetes; ii) to improve implementation and adherence to guideline-based therapies; and iii) to improve therapeutic strategies for managing atherogenic dyslipidaemia. The R3i believes that monitoring of non-HDL cholesterol provides a simple, practical tool for treatment decisions regarding the management of lipid-related residual cardiovascular risk. Addition of a fibrate, niacin (North and South America), omega-3 fatty acids or ezetimibe are all options for combination with a statin to further reduce non-HDL cholesterol, although lacking in hard evidence for cardiovascular outcome benefits. Several emerging treatments may offer promise. These include the next generation peroxisome proliferator-activated receptorα agonists, cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitors and monoclonal antibody therapy targeting proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9. However, long-term outcomes and safety data are clearly needed. In conclusion, the R3i believes that ongoing trials with these novel treatments may help to define the optimal management of atherogenic dyslipidaemia to reduce the clinical and socioeconomic burden of residual cardiovascular risk. © 2014 Fruchart et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.en_US
dc.identifier.citationCardiovascular Diabetology. Vol.13, No.1 (2014)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1475-2840-13-26en_US
dc.identifier.issn14752840en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84892772956en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/34316
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84892772956&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleResidual macrovascular risk in 2013: What have we learned?en_US
dc.typeReviewen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84892772956&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections