Publication: Utility of ultra-sensitive qPCR to detect Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax infections under different transmission intensities
| dc.contributor.author | Maria Gruenberg | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Clara Antunes Moniz | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Natalie E. Hofmann | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Cristian Koepfli | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Leanne J. Robinson | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Elma Nate | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Wuelton Marcelo Monteiro | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Gisely Cardoso de Melo | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Andrea Kuehn | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Andre M. Siqueira | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Wang Nguitragool | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Quique Bassat | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Marcus Lacerda | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Jetsumon Sattabongkot | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Ivo Mueller | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Ingrid Felger | en_US |
| dc.contributor.other | Instituto de Salud Global de Barcelona | en_US |
| dc.contributor.other | Papua New Guinea Institute of Medical Research | en_US |
| dc.contributor.other | Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research | en_US |
| dc.contributor.other | University of Melbourne | en_US |
| dc.contributor.other | Universitat Basel | en_US |
| dc.contributor.other | Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute (Swiss TPH) | en_US |
| dc.contributor.other | University of Notre Dame | en_US |
| dc.contributor.other | Mahidol University | en_US |
| dc.contributor.other | Burnet Institute | en_US |
| dc.contributor.other | Universidade do Estado do Amazonas | en_US |
| dc.contributor.other | Institut Pasteur, Paris | en_US |
| dc.contributor.other | Fundação de Medicina Tropical Dr. Heitor Vieira Dourado | en_US |
| dc.contributor.other | Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-10-05T05:14:26Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2020-10-05T05:14:26Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020-09-03 | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | BACKGROUND: The use of molecular diagnostics has revealed an unexpectedly large number of asymptomatic low-density malaria infections in many malaria endemic areas. This study compared the gains in parasite prevalence obtained by the use of ultra-sensitive (us)-qPCR as compared to standard qPCR in cross-sectional surveys conducted in Thailand, Brazil and Papua New Guinea (PNG). The compared assays differed in the copy number of qPCR targets in the parasite genome. METHODS: Plasmodium falciparum (Pf) and Plasmodium vivax (Pv) parasites were quantified by qPCR amplifying the low-copy Pf_ and Pv_18S rRNA genes or the multi-copy targets Pf_varATS and Pv_mtCOX1. Cross-sectional surveys at the three study sites included 2252 participants of all ages and represented different transmission intensities. RESULTS: In the two low-transmission areas, P. falciparum positivity was 1.3% (10/773) (Thailand) and 0.8% (5/651) (Brazil) using standard Pf_18S rRNA qPCR. In these two countries, P. falciparum positivity by Pf_varATS us-qPCR increased to 1.9% (15/773) and 1.7% (11/651). In PNG, an area with moderate transmission intensity, P. falciparum positivity significantly increased from 8.6% (71/828) by standard qPCR to 12.2% (101/828) by us-qPCR. The proportions of P. falciparum infections not detected by standard qPCR were 33%, 55% and 30% in Thailand, Brazil and PNG. Plasmodium vivax was the predominating species in Thailand and Brazil, with 3.9% (30/773) and 4.9% (32/651) positivity by Pv_18S rRNA qPCR. In PNG, P. vivax positivity was similar to P. falciparum, at 8.0% (66/828). Use of Pv_mtCOX1 us-qPCR led to a significant increase in positivity to 5.1% (39/773), 6.4% (42/651) and 11.5% (95/828) in Thailand, Brazil, and PNG. The proportions of P. vivax infections missed by standard qPCR were similar at all three sites, with 23%, 24% and 31% in Thailand, Brazil and PNG. CONCLUSION: The proportional gains in the detection of P. falciparum and P. vivax infections by ultra-sensitive diagnostic assays were substantial at all three study sites. Thus, us-qPCR yields more precise prevalence estimates for both P. falciparum and P. vivax at all studied levels of endemicity and represents a significant diagnostic improvement. Improving sensitivity in P. vivax surveillance by us-qPCR is of particular benefit, because the additionally detected P. vivax infections signal the potential presence of hypnozoites and subsequent risk of relapse and further transmission. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.citation | Malaria journal. Vol.19, No.1 (2020), 319 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1186/s12936-020-03374-7 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issn | 14752875 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.other | 2-s2.0-85090320683 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/59114 | |
| dc.rights | Mahidol University | en_US |
| dc.rights.holder | SCOPUS | en_US |
| dc.source.uri | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85090320683&origin=inward | en_US |
| dc.subject | Immunology and Microbiology | en_US |
| dc.subject | Medicine | en_US |
| dc.title | Utility of ultra-sensitive qPCR to detect Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax infections under different transmission intensities | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| mu.datasource.scopus | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85090320683&origin=inward | en_US |
