Publication:
Three-dimensional motion analysis of ten common Asian sitting positions in daily living and factors affect range of hip motions

dc.contributor.authorPhob Ganokrojen_US
dc.contributor.authorJirayu Chaowalitwongen_US
dc.contributor.authorPichitpol Kerdsomnueken_US
dc.contributor.authorNarumol Sudjaien_US
dc.contributor.authorPisit Lertwanichen_US
dc.contributor.authorBavornrat Vanadurongwanen_US
dc.contributor.otherSiriraj Hospitalen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-04T09:03:11Z
dc.date.available2022-08-04T09:03:11Z
dc.date.issued2021-12-01en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Sitting involves many activities of daily life and requires most motion in the hip joint. Asians have more hip flexion and external rotation motions than Westerners owing to cultural and lifestyle differences. Being aware of the normal range of hip motion is essential in clinical practice. Limited research has focused on the hip motions of common sitting positions. The objective was to determine the hip motions of 10 common sitting positions, and to determine whether gender or being overweight affects the range of hip motions. Methods: An experimental cross-sectional study was conducted to determine hip motions by using a standard, three-dimensional, motion-analysis system. Healthy subjects performed 10 sitting positions during 3 trials. All hip-kinematic data were measured on the dominant leg of each participant, except for the right- and left-monk positions (both hips were analyzed). Density plots were constructed and statistical analyses were performed to detect the differences between groups (male and female; non-overweight and overweight). Results: The 48 participants comprised 24 males and 24 females. Most were right-leg dominant (45 participants, 93.8%). Of the 22 participants in the overweight group (body mass index ≥23 kg/m2), 18 (75%) were male. Squatting showed the highest flexion angle (99.7°, 47.3°–122°). Cross-legged sitting had the highest abduction angle (28.9°, 9.9°–45.7°) and the largest external rotation angle (62°, 37.6°–81.7°). In the female group, there were trends toward a greater flexion angle (4 out of 10 sitting positions) and a smaller abduction angle (6 out of 9 positions), with P values < 0.05. As to body weight, the overweight participants had a smaller flexion angle but a greater abduction angle, with 5 out of 9 positions having a P value < 0.05. Kinematic data of the transverse plane revealed that the heterogeneity of the rotational angles depended on the sitting position. Conclusions: This study provided the functional hip motions of common Asian sitting positions. The kinematic data can be utilized in clinical practice as reference values to determine safe positions. Gender and being overweight affected the hip angles in the sagittal and frontal planes. Trial registration: Number TCTR20181021004, retrospectively registered at the Thai Clinical Trials Registry (http//:www.clinicaltrials.in.th).en_US
dc.identifier.citationBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. Vol.22, No.1 (2021)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12891-021-04487-zen_US
dc.identifier.issn14712474en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85109776568en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/77558
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85109776568&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleThree-dimensional motion analysis of ten common Asian sitting positions in daily living and factors affect range of hip motionsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85109776568&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections