Publication:
Anticoagulation control of pharmacist-managed collaborative care versus usual care in Thailand

dc.contributor.authorSurasak Saokaewen_US
dc.contributor.authorUbonwan Sapooen_US
dc.contributor.authorSurakit Nathisuwanen_US
dc.contributor.authorNathorn Chaiyakunapruken_US
dc.contributor.authorUnchalee Permsuwanen_US
dc.contributor.otherChiang Mai Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Phayaoen_US
dc.contributor.otherMaharat Nakornratchasima Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherNaresuan Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Queenslanden_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Wisconsin Madisonen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-11T04:50:35Z
dc.date.available2018-06-11T04:50:35Z
dc.date.issued2012-02-01en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective There has been a lack of evidence of the effects of pharmacist-managed warfarin therapy (PMWT) in developing countries (e.g. Southeast Asian countries) where the patients' characteristics, genetic make-up, clinical practice and healthcare system are different from the Western world. This study aimed to compare the anticoagulation control and clinical outcomes associated with warfarin therapy provided by PMWT to usual care (UC) in the Thai population. Setting A 1,000-bed tertiary-care hospital in Nakornratchasima province of Thailand. Method A quasi-experimental study comparing PMWT and UC in patients receiving long-term warfarin therapy. For PMWT group, clinical pharmacists optimised the warfarin therapy and suggested recommendations (e.g. dose adjustment, safer alternative drugs, and follow-up time) to physicians. The UC group received the standard care. Main outcome measure Time in therapeutic range (TTR), both actual- and expanded-TTR, bleeding and thromboembolic complications, and physician' acceptance of pharmacist suggestions. Results Of 433 patients enrolled, 220 and 213 were in the PMWT and UC groups respectively. At baseline, patient's characteristics of both groups were comparable. At the end of follow-up period, patients in the PMWT group had significantly higher actual-TTR (48.3% vs. 40.1%; P < 0.001) and expanded-TTR (62.7% vs. 53.9%; P < 0.001) compared to those in the UC group. Rates of major bleeding were 4.4 vs 4.5 events per 100 person-years for the PMWT and UC groups, respectively. Pharmacists performed 284 interventions with an acceptance rate of 80.3% from physicians. Conclusion Pharmacist-managed warfarin therapy resulted in a significantly better anticoagulation control. This study showed that a collaborative approach in anticoagulation management can be successfully implemented in a developing country. Implementation of such care model in other developing countries should be considered. © 2011 CARS.en_US
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Clinical Pharmacy. Vol.34, No.1 (2012), 105-112en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11096-011-9597-8en_US
dc.identifier.issn22107703en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84860796607en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/14221
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84860796607&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectHealth Professionsen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.subjectPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceuticsen_US
dc.titleAnticoagulation control of pharmacist-managed collaborative care versus usual care in Thailanden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84860796607&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections