Publication:
Ventilatory effect of midazolam in propofol deep sedation for hepatic tumor patients undergoing percutaneous radiofrequency ablation procedure

dc.contributor.authorKrongthip Sripunjanen_US
dc.contributor.authorPattharaporn Sombooden_US
dc.contributor.authorPhongtara Vichitvejpaisalen_US
dc.contributor.authorSomchai Amornyotinen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-04T09:29:09Z
dc.date.available2022-08-04T09:29:09Z
dc.date.issued2021-03-03en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of the study was to compare the ventilatory effect between propofol deep sedation technique with and without midazolam in hepatic tumor patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation procedure. Methods: Three hundred and seventy-four patients who underwent radiofrequency ablation procedure in a single year were randomly assigned to the deep sedation without midazolam group (A, n = 187) and deep sedation with midazolam group (B, n = 187). Patients in group A received normal saline, and those in group B received 0.02 mg/kg of midazolam intravenously in equivalent volume. All patients were oxygenated with 100% O2 via nasal cannula and sedated with intravenous fentanyl and the titration of intravenous propofol. Ventilatory parameters, including oxygen saturation, end tidal carbon dioxide, and respiratory rate every five minutes, during and after the procedure, as well as the duration of sleep and sedation score in the recovery room, were recorded. Results: There were no significant differences in the patients’ characteristics, duration of procedure, total dose of propofol, ventilatory parameters including oxygen saturation, end tidal carbon dioxide, and respiratory rate, as well as sedation score at 20, 25, 30, 35, and 40 min after the procedure, between the two groups. However, mean sedation score at 5, 10, and 15 min after the procedure, in group B, was significantly lower than in group A. In addition, the duration of sleep after the procedure, in group B, was significantly greater than in group A. No serious ventilatory adverse effects were observed either group. Conclusion: Propofol deep sedation with and without midazolam for hepatic tumor patients who underwent radiofrequency ablation procedure was safe and effective. A low dose of midazolam in propofol deep-sedation technique did not create serious ventilatory effects.en_US
dc.identifier.citationGastroenterology Insights. Vol.12, No.1 (2021), 89-99en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/GASTROENT12010009en_US
dc.identifier.issn20367422en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85103575630en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/78357
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85103575630&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleVentilatory effect of midazolam in propofol deep sedation for hepatic tumor patients undergoing percutaneous radiofrequency ablation procedureen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85103575630&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections