Publication: Early experience of robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
Issued Date
2008-03-01
Resource Type
ISSN
01252208
01252208
01252208
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-41749104000
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand. Vol.91, No.3 (2008), 377-382
Suggested Citation
Sittiporn Srinualnad Early experience of robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand. Vol.91, No.3 (2008), 377-382. Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/19736
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
Early experience of robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
Author(s)
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Introduction: Quality of life after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy has been a discussed issue among patients. Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy (RALRP) has been shown to provide the best surgical outcomes in terms of potency and continence. The program of robotic prostatectomy was started at Siriraj Hospital. Early result of the author's experience was evaluated. Objective: To evaluate the feasibility of Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy done at Siriraj Hospital. Material and Method: From March 2007 to November 2007, 34 patients (Group 1) with localized prostate cancer underwent Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy (RALRP). Perioperative data was evaluated and compared to those of 34 patients (group 2) who underwent Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy (LRP) during the same period by the same surgeon. Results: There were no demographic differences between the two groups. Catheterization time was significantly shortened in the RALRP group (p < 0.05). There was no major complication in the RALRP group, one LRP patient suffered bilateral ureteric injuries and required bilateral reimplantation. In pathological T2 patients of the last 17 consecutive cases, positive surgical margin rate was similar (14%) in both groups. Conclusion: The author early experience has shown that RALRP is feasible and safe. Oncological outcome can be improved with more experience and long term follow up is needed to evaluate functional outcome including potency rate and incontinence rate.