Publication: General Versus Neuraxial Anesthesia for Appendectomy: A Multicenter International Study
Issued Date
2021-11-01
Resource Type
ISSN
14322323
03642313
03642313
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-85100549043
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
World Journal of Surgery. Vol.45, No.11 (2021), 3295-3301
Suggested Citation
Mohamad El Moheb, Kelsey Han, Kerry Breen, Majed El Hechi, Zhenyi Jia, Ava Mokhtari, Napaporn Kongkaewpaisan, Manasnun Kongwibulwut, Gabriel Rodriguez, Camilo Ortega, Huanlong Qin, Jun Yang, Renyuan Gao, Zhiguo Wang, Zhiguang Gao, Supparerk Prichayudh, Gwendolyn M. van der Wilden, Stephanie Santin, Marcelo A.F. Ribeiro, Napakadol Noppakunsomboom, Joseph V. Sakran, Bellal Joseph, Ramzi Alami, Haytham M.A. Kaafarani General Versus Neuraxial Anesthesia for Appendectomy: A Multicenter International Study. World Journal of Surgery. Vol.45, No.11 (2021), 3295-3301. doi:10.1007/s00268-021-05978-9 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/77755
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
General Versus Neuraxial Anesthesia for Appendectomy: A Multicenter International Study
Author(s)
Mohamad El Moheb
Kelsey Han
Kerry Breen
Majed El Hechi
Zhenyi Jia
Ava Mokhtari
Napaporn Kongkaewpaisan
Manasnun Kongwibulwut
Gabriel Rodriguez
Camilo Ortega
Huanlong Qin
Jun Yang
Renyuan Gao
Zhiguo Wang
Zhiguang Gao
Supparerk Prichayudh
Gwendolyn M. van der Wilden
Stephanie Santin
Marcelo A.F. Ribeiro
Napakadol Noppakunsomboom
Joseph V. Sakran
Bellal Joseph
Ramzi Alami
Haytham M.A. Kaafarani
Kelsey Han
Kerry Breen
Majed El Hechi
Zhenyi Jia
Ava Mokhtari
Napaporn Kongkaewpaisan
Manasnun Kongwibulwut
Gabriel Rodriguez
Camilo Ortega
Huanlong Qin
Jun Yang
Renyuan Gao
Zhiguo Wang
Zhiguang Gao
Supparerk Prichayudh
Gwendolyn M. van der Wilden
Stephanie Santin
Marcelo A.F. Ribeiro
Napakadol Noppakunsomboom
Joseph V. Sakran
Bellal Joseph
Ramzi Alami
Haytham M.A. Kaafarani
Other Contributor(s)
Siriraj Hospital
Tongji University School of Medicine
Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital
Shanghai Dongfang Hospital
American University of Beirut
Massachusetts General Hospital
King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital
University of Arizona College of Medicine – Tucson
Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum
Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University
Changzheng Hospital
Universidade de São Paulo
Johns Hopkins University
Hospital Brasil Rede D´Or
Hospital Departamental Villavicencio
Tongji University School of Medicine
Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital
Shanghai Dongfang Hospital
American University of Beirut
Massachusetts General Hospital
King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital
University of Arizona College of Medicine – Tucson
Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum
Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University
Changzheng Hospital
Universidade de São Paulo
Johns Hopkins University
Hospital Brasil Rede D´Or
Hospital Departamental Villavicencio
Abstract
Background: In resource-limited countries, open appendectomy is still performed under general anesthesia (GA) or neuraxial anesthesia (NA). We sought to compare the postoperative outcomes of appendectomy under NA versus GA. Methods: We conducted a post hoc analysis of the International Patterns of Opioid Prescribing (iPOP) multicenter study. All patients ≥ 16 years-old who underwent an open appendectomy between October 2016 and March 2017 in one of the 14 participating hospitals were included. Patients were stratified into two groups: NA—defined as spinal or epidural—and GA. All-cause morbidity, hospital length of stay (LOS), and pain severity were assessed using univariate analysis followed by multivariable logistic regression adjusting for the following preoperative characteristics: age, gender, body mass index (BMI), smoking, history of opioid use, emergency status, and country. Results: A total of 655 patients were included, 353 of which were in the NA group and 302 in the GA group. The countries operating under NA were Colombia (39%), Thailand (31%), China (23%), and Brazil (7%). Overall, NA patients were younger (mean age (SD): 34.5 (14.4) vs. 40.7 (17.9), p-value < 0.001) and had a lower BMI (mean (SD): 23.5 (3.8) vs. 24.3 (5.2), p-value = 0.040) than GA patients. On multivariable analysis, NA was independently associated with less postoperative complications (OR, 95% CI: 0.30 [0.10–0.94]) and shorter hospital LOS (LOS > 3 days, OR, 95% CI: 0.47 [0.32–0.68]) compared to GA. There was no difference in postoperative pain severity between the two techniques. Conclusions: Open appendectomy performed under NA is associated with improved outcomes compared to that performed under GA. Further randomized controlled studies should examine the safety and value of NA in lower abdominal surgery.