Publication:
Development of the Siriraj Clinical Asthma Score

dc.contributor.authorPakit Vichyanonden_US
dc.contributor.authorJittima Veskitkulen_US
dc.contributor.authorNuanphong Rienmaneeen_US
dc.contributor.authorPunchama Pacharnen_US
dc.contributor.authorOrathai Jirapongsananuruken_US
dc.contributor.authorNualanong Visitsunthornen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-19T04:59:51Z
dc.date.available2018-10-19T04:59:51Z
dc.date.issued2013-11-29en_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Acute asthmatic attack in children commonly occurs despite the introduction of effective controllers such as inhaled corticosteroids and leukotriene modifiers. Treatment of acute asthmatic attack requires proper evaluation of attack severity and appropriate selection of medical therapy. In children, measurement of lung function is difficult during acute attack and thus clinical asthma scoring may aid physician in making further decision regarding treatment and admission. Methods: We enrolled 70 children with acute asthmatic attack with age range from 1 to 12 years (mean ± SD = 51.5 ± 31.8 months) into the study. Twelve selected asthma severity items were assessed by 2 independent observers prior to administration of salbutamol nebulization (up to 3 doses at 20 minutes interval). Decision for further therapy and admission was made by emergency department physician. Three different scoring systems were constructed from items with best validity. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of these scores were assessed. Inter-rater reliability was assessed for each score. Review of previous scoring systems was also conducted and reported. Results: Three severity items had poor validity, i.e., cyanosis, depressed cerebral function, and I:E ratio (p > 0.05). Three items had poor inter-rater reliability, i.e., breath sound quality, air entry, and I:E ratio. These items were omitted and three new clinical scores were constructed from the remaining items. Clinical scoring system comprised retractions, dyspnea, O2 saturation, respiratory rate and wheezing (range of score 0-10) gave the best accuracy and inter-rater variability and were chosen for clinical use - Siriraj Clinical Asthma Score (SCAS). Conclusion: A Clinical Asthma Score that is simple, relatively easy to administer and with good validity and variability is essential for treatment of acute asthma in children. Several good candidate scores have been introduced in the past. We described the development of the Siriraj Clinical Asthma Score (SCAS) in this report and reviewed the literature on the development of clinical asthma score for use in children.en_US
dc.identifier.citationAsian Pacific Journal of Allergy and Immunology. Vol.31, No.3 (2013), 210-216en_US
dc.identifier.issn22288694en_US
dc.identifier.issn0125877Xen_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84887576113en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/31835
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84887576113&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectImmunology and Microbiologyen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleDevelopment of the Siriraj Clinical Asthma Scoreen_US
dc.typeReviewen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84887576113&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections