Publication: Home-Based Contingency Management Delivered by Community Health Workers to Improve Alcohol Abstinence: A Randomized Control Trial
Issued Date
2020-03-19
Resource Type
ISSN
14643502
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-85082145030
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Alcohol and alcoholism (Oxford, Oxfordshire). Vol.55, No.2 (2020), 171-178
Suggested Citation
Tawanchai Jirapramukpitak, Keerati Pattanaseri, Kia Chong Chua, Patcharapim Takizawa Home-Based Contingency Management Delivered by Community Health Workers to Improve Alcohol Abstinence: A Randomized Control Trial. Alcohol and alcoholism (Oxford, Oxfordshire). Vol.55, No.2 (2020), 171-178. doi:10.1093/alcalc/agz106 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/56279
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
Home-Based Contingency Management Delivered by Community Health Workers to Improve Alcohol Abstinence: A Randomized Control Trial
Abstract
© The Author(s) 2020. Medical Council on Alcohol and Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness of home-based contingency management (CM) in improving abstinence in an incentive-dependent manner among alcoholic individuals. METHODS: A 12-week, home-visit (HV) only controlled, randomized incentive-ranging trial of 161 adults with current alcohol dependence was recruited using social network theory techniques. Participants randomly received HV, low- (CM-L) or higher-magnitude CM (CM-H). Community health workers made regular home visits, monitored drinking behavior and delivered CM as appropriate. Two follow-up visits at weeks 13 and 16 were conducted to assess whether abstinence would still be maintained after the interventions discontinued. Rates of continuous reported abstinence (primary), numbers of positive breath samples (secondary) over the intervention period and rates of prolonged reported abstinence (secondary) were evaluated. RESULTS: CM did not significantly improve the rates of continuous reported abstinence across the 12-week intervention period (odds ratio (OR) for trend 1.2, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.7-2.1, P = 0.601). There was a significant reduction, however, in the average number of positive breath samples submitted by the CM-H group (generalized linear model, β -0.5, 95% CI -0.9 to -0.2, P = 0.005). The CM-H arm also had a significantly higher abstinence rate during the follow-up period (OR 3.4, 95% CI 1.3-8.8, P = 0.013). Event history model suggested that the CM-H condition had significantly higher chances of achieving renewed abstinence across the study period (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.3-3.2, P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Home-based CM with sufficient incentive is promising in reducing alcohol use and in improving rates of abstinence over time. Allowing for a certain grace period may better capture the delayed treatment effect of home-based CM.
