Publication: A multifaceted individualized pneumoperitoneum strategy for laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a multicenter observational feasibility study
Issued Date
2019-01-15
Resource Type
ISSN
14322218
09302794
09302794
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-85049118792
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Surgical Endoscopy. Vol.33, No.1 (2019), 252-260
Suggested Citation
Oscar Diaz-Cambronero, Blas Flor Lorente, Guido Mazzinari, Maria Vila Montañes, Nuria García Gregorio, Daniel Robles Hernandez, Luis Enrique Olmedilla Arnal, Maria Pilar Argente Navarro, Marcus J. Schultz, Carlos L. Errando, Salvador Pous, Cristina Ballester, Matteo Frasson, Alvaro García-Granero, Carlos Cerdán Santacruz, Eduardo García-Granero, Luis Sanchez Guillen, Anabel Marqués Marí, David Casado Rodrigo, Joan Gibert Gerez, Rebeca Cosa Rodríguez, Mª de los Desamparados Moya Sanz, Marcos Rodriguez Martín, Jaime Zorrilla Ortúzar, José María Pérez-Peña, Maria Jose Alberola Estellés, Begoña Ayas Montero, Salome Matoses Jaen, Sandra Verdeguer, Michiel Warlé, David Cuesta Frau A multifaceted individualized pneumoperitoneum strategy for laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a multicenter observational feasibility study. Surgical Endoscopy. Vol.33, No.1 (2019), 252-260. doi:10.1007/s00464-018-6305-y Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/51964
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
A multifaceted individualized pneumoperitoneum strategy for laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a multicenter observational feasibility study
Author(s)
Oscar Diaz-Cambronero
Blas Flor Lorente
Guido Mazzinari
Maria Vila Montañes
Nuria García Gregorio
Daniel Robles Hernandez
Luis Enrique Olmedilla Arnal
Maria Pilar Argente Navarro
Marcus J. Schultz
Carlos L. Errando
Salvador Pous
Cristina Ballester
Matteo Frasson
Alvaro García-Granero
Carlos Cerdán Santacruz
Eduardo García-Granero
Luis Sanchez Guillen
Anabel Marqués Marí
David Casado Rodrigo
Joan Gibert Gerez
Rebeca Cosa Rodríguez
Mª de los Desamparados Moya Sanz
Marcos Rodriguez Martín
Jaime Zorrilla Ortúzar
José María Pérez-Peña
Maria Jose Alberola Estellés
Begoña Ayas Montero
Salome Matoses Jaen
Sandra Verdeguer
Michiel Warlé
David Cuesta Frau
Blas Flor Lorente
Guido Mazzinari
Maria Vila Montañes
Nuria García Gregorio
Daniel Robles Hernandez
Luis Enrique Olmedilla Arnal
Maria Pilar Argente Navarro
Marcus J. Schultz
Carlos L. Errando
Salvador Pous
Cristina Ballester
Matteo Frasson
Alvaro García-Granero
Carlos Cerdán Santacruz
Eduardo García-Granero
Luis Sanchez Guillen
Anabel Marqués Marí
David Casado Rodrigo
Joan Gibert Gerez
Rebeca Cosa Rodríguez
Mª de los Desamparados Moya Sanz
Marcos Rodriguez Martín
Jaime Zorrilla Ortúzar
José María Pérez-Peña
Maria Jose Alberola Estellés
Begoña Ayas Montero
Salome Matoses Jaen
Sandra Verdeguer
Michiel Warlé
David Cuesta Frau
Abstract
© 2018, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature. Background: While guidelines for laparoscopic abdominal surgery advise using the lowest possible intra-abdominal pressure, commonly a standard pressure is used. We evaluated the feasibility of a predefined multifaceted individualized pneumoperitoneum strategy aiming at the lowest possible intra-abdominal pressure during laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Methods: Multicenter prospective study in patients scheduled for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. The strategy consisted of ventilation with low tidal volume, a modified lithotomy position, deep neuromuscular blockade, pre-stretching of the abdominal wall, and individualized intra-abdominal pressure titration; the effect was blindly evaluated by the surgeon. The primary endpoint was the proportion of surgical procedures completed at each individualized intra-abdominal pressure level. Secondary endpoints were the respiratory system driving pressure, and the estimated volume of insufflated CO 2 gas needed to perform the surgical procedure. Results: Ninety-two patients were enrolled in the study. Fourteen cases were converted to open surgery for reasons not related to the strategy. The intervention was feasible in all patients and well-accepted by all surgeons. In 61 out of 78 patients (78%), surgery was performed and completed at the lowest possible IAP, 8 mmHg. In 17 patients, IAP was raised up to 12 mmHg. The relationship between IAP and driving pressure was almost linear. The mean estimated intra-abdominal CO 2 volume at which surgery was performed was 3.2 L. Conclusion: A multifaceted individualized pneumoperitoneum strategy during laparoscopic colorectal surgery was feasible and resulted in an adequate working space in most patients at lower intra-abdominal pressure and lower respiratory driving pressure. ClinicalTrials.gov (Trial Identifier: NCT03000465).