Publication:
Thai clinicians’ attitudes toward antimicrobial stewardship programs

dc.contributor.authorNantanit Sutthiruken_US
dc.contributor.authorJulie Considineen_US
dc.contributor.authorAna Hutchinsonen_US
dc.contributor.authorAndrea Driscollen_US
dc.contributor.authorKumthorn Malathumen_US
dc.contributor.authorMari Bottien_US
dc.contributor.otherEpworth HealthCareen_US
dc.contributor.otherDeakin Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherEastern Healthen_US
dc.contributor.otherAustin Healthen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-28T06:16:27Z
dc.date.available2019-08-28T06:16:27Z
dc.date.issued2018-04-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2018 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Background: Effective hospital-wide antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programs need multidisciplinary engagement; however, clinicians’ attitudes have not been investigated in Thailand where AMS is in early development. The aim of this study was to explore Thai clinicians’ (doctors, nurses, and pharmacists) perceptions and attitudes toward AMS. Methods: A paper-based survey was distributed in a 1,000-bed university hospital in Bangkok, Thailand, between November 9, 2015, and December 21, 2015. A total of 1,087 clinicians participated: 392 doctors, 613 nurses, and 82 pharmacists. Results: Most participants agreed that improving antimicrobial prescribing would decrease antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and should be a priority of hospital policy. Doctors were less likely to agree with policies that limit antimicrobial prescribing (P <.001) than nurses or pharmacists, and were less likely to be interested in participating in AMS education than other clinicians (P <.001). Pharmacists indicated higher agreement with the statement, recommending that a specialist team provide individualized antimicrobial prescribing advice (P <.01) and that feedback improves antimicrobial selection (P <.001). Nurses were less likely to agree that community antibiotic use (P <.001) or patient pressure for antibiotics contribute to AMR (P <.001). Conclusions: AMS programs are vital to improving antimicrobial use by clinicians. Understanding clinicians’ attitudes and perceptions related to AMS is important to ensure that AMS programs developed address areas relevant to local clinical needs.en_US
dc.identifier.citationAmerican Journal of Infection Control. Vol.46, No.4 (2018), 425-430en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ajic.2017.09.022en_US
dc.identifier.issn15273296en_US
dc.identifier.issn01966553en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85033494016en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/46800
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85033494016&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleThai clinicians’ attitudes toward antimicrobial stewardship programsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85033494016&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections