Publication:
Immunogenic response in obese patients undergoing rabies post-exposure prophylaxis with combined equine rabies immunoglobulin and rabies vaccination

dc.contributor.authorJatuporn Sirikunen_US
dc.contributor.authorYupin Suputtamongkolen_US
dc.contributor.authorPloypailin Rattanachinakornen_US
dc.contributor.authorAthiwat Primsirikunawuten_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherNational Institutes of Health, Bethesdaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-23T10:38:20Z
dc.date.available2019-08-23T10:38:20Z
dc.date.issued2018-01-04en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2017 Elsevier Ltd Background Obesity is a risk factor for increased morbidity and mortality associated with many vaccine preventable infectious diseases such as influenza. Moreover, higher volume of passive rabies immunoglobulin (RIG) due to weight based dosing might suppress vaccine-induced immune responses in obese patients. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of obesity on humoral immune responses to combined equine RIG and rabies vaccine treatment among patients with WHO category III exposure to a rabies suspected animal. Methods A single centre, prospective, open-labelled study among WHO category III rabies exposed patients was conducted to compare serum rabies virus neutralizing antibody (RVNA) responses measured by rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test between obese (body mass index, BMI > 30 kg/m2) and control (BMI < 25 kg/m2) patients after combined immunization with equine rabies immunoglobulin and purified chick-embryo cell rabies vaccine for post exposure prophylaxis treatment. Results Post-vaccination geometric mean titer (GMT) of RVNA concentrations between two groups at day 7 were 0.33 (95% CI: 0.23, 0.46) vs 0.39 (95% CI: 0.27, 0.55), 4.61 (95% CI: 3.20, 6.63) vs 3.78 (95% CI: 2.77, 5.16) at day 14, and 7.45 (95% CI: 5.86, 9.49) vs 5.93 (95%CI: 4.46–7.90) at day 28 for obese and control patients, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference of RVNA GMT between two groups. Seroconversion to at least adequate concentration (RVNA titer ≥0.5 IU/mL) rates were 34% at day 7 and 100% at days 14 and 28 in both groups. There were no immediate hypersensitivity reaction and no serious adverse events observed during the study period. Conclusions There was no evidence of immunosuppression of antibodies’ responses in obese patients. Combined ERIG and rabies virus vaccination for post exposure treatment is safe.en_US
dc.identifier.citationVaccine. Vol.36, No.2 (2018), 285-291en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.11.058en_US
dc.identifier.issn18732518en_US
dc.identifier.issn0264410Xen_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85035192395en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/45269
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85035192395&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biologyen_US
dc.subjectImmunology and Microbiologyen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.subjectVeterinaryen_US
dc.titleImmunogenic response in obese patients undergoing rabies post-exposure prophylaxis with combined equine rabies immunoglobulin and rabies vaccinationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85035192395&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections