Publication:
An IAEA survey of radiotherapy practice including quality assurance extent and depth

dc.contributor.authorB. J. Healyen_US
dc.contributor.authorM. Budanecen_US
dc.contributor.authorB. Ourdaneen_US
dc.contributor.authorT. Peaceen_US
dc.contributor.authorB. Petrovicen_US
dc.contributor.authorD. E. Sanzen_US
dc.contributor.authorD. J. Scanderbegen_US
dc.contributor.authorL. Tuntipumiamornen_US
dc.contributor.otherDepartment of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciencesen_US
dc.contributor.otherInstitute of Oncology Sremska Kamenicaen_US
dc.contributor.otherInternational Atomic Energy Agency, Viennaen_US
dc.contributor.otherCentro Atomico Barilocheen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherChristian Medical College, Velloreen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T05:08:34Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T05:08:34Z
dc.date.issued2020-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2020, © 2020 International Atomic Energy Agency. Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. Background: The IAEA recommends a quality assurance program in radiotherapy to ensure safe and effective treatments. In this study, radiotherapy departments were surveyed on their current practice including the extent and depth of quality assurance activities. Methods: Radiotherapy departments were voluntarily surveyed in three stages, firstly, in basic facility information, secondly, in quality assurance activities and treatment techniques, and thirdly, in a snapshot of quality assurance, departmental and treatment activities. Results: The IAEA received completed surveys from 381 radiotherapy departments throughout the world with 100 radiotherapy departments completing all three surveys. Dominant patterns were found in linac-based radiotherapy with access to treatment planning systems for 3D-CRT and 3D imaging. Staffing levels for major staff groups were on average in the range recommended by the IAEA. The modal patient workload per EBRT unit was as expected in the range of 21–30 patients per day, however significant instances of high workload (more than 50 patients per day per treatment unit) were reported. Staffing levels were found to correlate with amount of treatment equipment and patient workload. In a self-assessment of quality assurance performance, most radiotherapy departments reported that they would perform at least 60% of the quality assurance activities itemized in the second survey, with particular strength in equipment quality control. In a snapshot survey of quality assurance performance, again equipment quality control practice was well developed, particularly for the treatment equipment. Conclusions: The IAEA surveys provide a snapshot of current radiotherapy practice including quality assurance activities.en_US
dc.identifier.citationActa Oncologica. (2020)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/0284186X.2020.1714721en_US
dc.identifier.issn1651226Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn0284186Xen_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85078439247en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/53875
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85078439247&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleAn IAEA survey of radiotherapy practice including quality assurance extent and depthen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85078439247&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections