Publication:
Arterolane–piperaquine–mefloquine versus arterolane–piperaquine and artemether–lumefantrine in the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Kenyan children: a single-centre, open-label, randomised, non-inferiority trial

dc.contributor.authorMainga Hamalubaen_US
dc.contributor.authorRob W. van der Pluijmen_US
dc.contributor.authorJoseph Weyaen_US
dc.contributor.authorPatricia Njugunaen_US
dc.contributor.authorMwanajuma Ngamaen_US
dc.contributor.authorPeter Kalumeen_US
dc.contributor.authorGabriel Mwambinguen_US
dc.contributor.authorCaroline Ngetsaen_US
dc.contributor.authorJuliana Wambuaen_US
dc.contributor.authorMwanamvua Bogaen_US
dc.contributor.authorNeema Mturien_US
dc.contributor.authorAltaf A. Lalen_US
dc.contributor.authorArshad Khurooen_US
dc.contributor.authorWalter R.J. Tayloren_US
dc.contributor.authorSónia Gonçalvesen_US
dc.contributor.authorOlivo Miottoen_US
dc.contributor.authorMehul Dhordaen_US
dc.contributor.authorBrian Mutindaen_US
dc.contributor.authorMavuto Mukakaen_US
dc.contributor.authorNaomi Waithiraen_US
dc.contributor.authorRichard M. Hoglunden_US
dc.contributor.authorMallika Imwongen_US
dc.contributor.authorJoel Tarningen_US
dc.contributor.authorNicholas P.J. Dayen_US
dc.contributor.authorNicholas J. Whiteen_US
dc.contributor.authorPhilip Bejonen_US
dc.contributor.authorArjen M. Dondorpen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherWellcome Trust Research Laboratories Nairobien_US
dc.contributor.otherNuffield Department of Medicineen_US
dc.contributor.otherWellcome Sanger Instituteen_US
dc.contributor.otherSun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.en_US
dc.contributor.otherWorldwide Antimalarial Resistance Networken_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-04T09:11:47Z
dc.date.available2022-08-04T09:11:47Z
dc.date.issued2021-10-01en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Triple antimalarial combination therapies combine potent and rapidly cleared artemisinins or related synthetic ozonides, such as arterolane, with two, more slowly eliminated partner drugs to reduce the risk of resistance. We aimed to assess the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of arterolane–piperaquine–mefloquine versus arterolane–piperaquine and artemether–lumefantrine for the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Kenyan children. Methods: In this single-centre, open-label, randomised, non-inferiority trial done in Kilifi County Hospital, Kilifi, coastal Kenya, children with uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria were recruited. Eligible patients were aged 2–12 years and had an asexual parasitaemia of 5000–250 000 parasites per μL. The exclusion criteria included the presence of an acute illness other than malaria, the inability to tolerate oral medications, treatment with an artemisinin derivative in the previous 7 days, a known hypersensitivity or contraindication to any of the study drugs, and a QT interval corrected for heart rate (QTc interval) longer than 450 ms. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1), by use of blocks of six, nine, and 12, and opaque, sealed, and sequentially numbered envelopes, to receive either arterolane–piperaquine, arterolane–piperaquine–mefloquine, or artemether–lumefantrine. Laboratory staff, but not the patients, the patients' parents or caregivers, clinical or medical officers, nurses, or trial statistician, were masked to the intervention groups. For 3 days, oral artemether–lumefantrine was administered twice daily (target dose 5–24 mg/kg of bodyweight of artemether and 29–144 mg/kg of bodyweight of lumefantrine), and oral arterolane–piperaquine (arterolane dose 4 mg/kg of bodyweight; piperaquine dose 20 mg/kg of bodyweight) and oral arterolane–piperaquine–mefloquine (mefloquine dose 8 mg/kg of bodyweight) were administered once daily. All patients received 0·25 mg/kg of bodyweight of oral primaquine at hour 24. All patients were admitted to Kilifi County Hospital for at least 3 consecutive days and followed up at day 7 and, thereafter, weekly for up to 42 days. The primary endpoint was 42-day PCR-corrected efficacy, defined as the absence of treatment failure in the first 42 days post-treatment, of arterolane–piperaquine–mefloquine versus artemether–lumefantrine, and, along with safety, was analysed in the intention-to-treat population, which comprised all patients who received at least one dose of a study drug. The 42-day PCR-corrected efficacy of arterolane–piperaquine–mefloquine versus arterolane–piperaquine was an important secondary endpoint and was also analysed in the intention-to-treat population. The non-inferiority margin for the risk difference between treatments was −7%. The study is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03452475, and is completed. Findings: Between March 7, 2018, and May 2, 2019, 533 children with P falciparum were screened, of whom 217 were randomly assigned to receive either arterolane–piperaquine (n=73), arterolane–piperaquine–mefloquine (n=72), or artemether–lumefantrine (n=72) and comprised the intention-to-treat population. The 42-day PCR-corrected efficacy after treatment with arterolane–piperaquine–mefloquine (100%, 95% CI 95–100; 72/72) was non-inferior to that after treatment with artemether–lumefantrine (96%, 95% CI 88–99; 69/72; risk difference 4%, 95% CI 0–9; p=0·25). The 42-day PCR-corrected efficacy of arterolane–piperaquine–mefloquine was non-inferior to that of arterolane–piperaquine (100%, 95% CI 95–100; 73/73; risk difference 0%). Vomiting rates in the first hour post-drug administration were significantly higher in patients treated with arterolane–piperaquine (5%, 95% CI 2–9; ten of 203 drug administrations; p=0·0013) or arterolane–piperaquine–mefloquine (5%, 3–9; 11 of 209 drug administrations; p=0·0006) than in patients treated with artemether–lumefantrine (1%, 0–2; three of 415 drug administrations). Upper respiratory tract complaints (n=26 for artemether–lumefantrine; n=19 for arterolane–piperaquine–mefloquine; n=23 for arterolane–piperaquine), headache (n=13; n=4; n=5), and abdominal pain (n=7; n=5; n=5) were the most frequently reported adverse events. There were no deaths. Interpretation: This study shows that arterolane–piperaquine–mefloquine is an efficacious and safe treatment for uncomplicated falciparum malaria in children and could potentially be used to prevent or delay the emergence of antimalarial resistance. Funding: UK Department for International Development, The Wellcome Trust, The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Sun Pharmaceutical Industriesen_US
dc.identifier.citationThe Lancet Infectious Diseases. Vol.21, No.10 (2021), 1395-1406en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30929-4en_US
dc.identifier.issn14744457en_US
dc.identifier.issn14733099en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85109372761en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/77832
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85109372761&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleArterolane–piperaquine–mefloquine versus arterolane–piperaquine and artemether–lumefantrine in the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Kenyan children: a single-centre, open-label, randomised, non-inferiority trialen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85109372761&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections