Publication:
Mesh fixation technique for inguinal hernia repair: Protocol for an umbrella review with integrated and updated network meta-analysis

dc.contributor.authorSuphakarn Techapongsatornen_US
dc.contributor.authorAmarit Tansaweten_US
dc.contributor.authorWisit Kasetsermwiriyaen_US
dc.contributor.authorOraluck Pattanaprateepen_US
dc.contributor.authorAmmarin Thakkinstianen_US
dc.contributor.otherVajira Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-27T09:28:02Z
dc.date.available2020-01-27T09:28:02Z
dc.date.issued2019-10-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2019 Author(s). Introduction Inguinal hernia mesh repair is the standard care for symptomatic inguinal hernia. Mesh fixation is used to keep mesh in place for which various mesh fixation techniques have been used in open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair, but their effectiveness has remained inconclusive. Therefore, we developed a protocol for an umbrella review in order to summarise the evidences with integrate and update data of different mesh fixation techniques in both open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Methods and analysis Previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses will be identified from Medline, Scopus, Cochrane Databases, EMBASE, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, PROSPERO Register, CINAHL, JBISRIS, EPPI-Centre, Wiley Online Library and Science Direct database. Two reviewers will independently determine studies for eligibility. Disagreement will be solved by consensus and arbitrated by the third reviewer. Data extraction will also be performed by two independent reviewers. For umbrella review, a descriptive analysis will be applied to describe evidence of mesh fixation effectiveness. Overlapping studies and excess significance test will be performed to assess whether previous evidences are bias. In addition, individual studies from meta-analysis and additional published studies will be pooled using network meta-analyses. We will use I 2 statistic and Cochran's Q test to assess heterogeneity. Risk of bias and publication bias, if appropriate, will be evaluated, as well as overall strength of the evidence. Ethics and dissemination This protocol has been registered with PROSPERO and approved with Institutional Review Board, Faculty of Medicine Vajira Hospital, Navamindradhiraj University, Bangkok, Thailand (COA 167/2018). The results will be published in peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO registration number CRD42018111773en_US
dc.identifier.citationBMJ Open. Vol.9, No.10 (2019)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031742en_US
dc.identifier.issn20446055en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85074294648en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/51383
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85074294648&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleMesh fixation technique for inguinal hernia repair: Protocol for an umbrella review with integrated and updated network meta-analysisen_US
dc.typeReviewen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85074294648&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections