Publication:
Comparison of dimensions and residual forces of various orthodontic elastomeric ligatures

dc.contributor.authorNiwat Anuwongnukrohen_US
dc.contributor.authorNittaya Jiraanankulen_US
dc.contributor.authorSurachai Dechkunakornen_US
dc.contributor.authorPornkiat Churnjitapiromen_US
dc.contributor.authorPeerapong Tua-Ngamen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-19T04:55:02Z
dc.date.available2018-10-19T04:55:02Z
dc.date.issued2013-10-07en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: The study aimed to compare dimensions and residual forces of various commercial type orthodontic elastomeric ligatures available in Thailand. Materials and Methods: The study compared 5 types of elastomeric ligatures: MU-MTEC, Unitek™, Morelli™, Welovehealth™ and Dentsply™. A digital caliper was used to measure dimensions: the inner and outer diameters and cross-sectional thickness. Then the initial extension force and residual force on days 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 14 and 28 were measured according to ISO 21606: 2007. The data were analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis test and Spearman's rank correlation. Results: No significant difference was found between the outer diameter of MU-MTEC and Welovehealth™. However, significant mean differences were found in dimensions among the other ligature types. The lowest mean for inner diameter and cross sectional thickness was found in Unitek™ and the lowest mean for outer diameter was found in Morelli™. The highest mean inner diameter, outer diameter and cross sectional thickness was found in Dentsply, Unitek™, and Morelli™, respectively. In terms of initial extension force, significant differences (p<0.001) were found among all samples. The highest mean was found in Dentsply™ (2.69 N) and the lowest mean was found in Welovehealth™ (1. 80 N). All samples had rapid force degradation at about 42. 21-56. 23% after 24 hours, with a slow degradation rate until Week 1 and a constantly stable rate from Weeks 1-4. The greatest force decay on the first day was found in Morelli™ (56.23%). At 28 days, the residual force for all types of elastomeric ligature was about 31. 97-46. 84%. Conclusion: All 5 brands of commercial elastomeric ligatures had different dimensions, initial extension forces and residual forces. The correlation between brand and dimension, initial extension force and residual force showed different patterns. All elastomeric ligatures had greater force decay on the first day (residual force 43. 77-57. 79%), then slightly decreased over 28 days. © (2013) Trans Tech Publications, Switzerland.en_US
dc.identifier.citationAdvanced Materials Research. Vol.746, (2013), 315-320en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.746.315en_US
dc.identifier.issn10226680en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84884827598en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/31734
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84884827598&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectEngineeringen_US
dc.titleComparison of dimensions and residual forces of various orthodontic elastomeric ligaturesen_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84884827598&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections