Publication: A double-blinded randomized controlled trial of silymarin for the prevention of antituberculosis drug-induced liver injury
dc.contributor.author | Chote Luangchosiri | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Ammarin Thakkinstian | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Sermsiri Chitphuk | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Wasana Stitchantrakul | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Supanna Petraksa | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Abhasnee Sobhonslidsuk | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | Mahidol University. Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-08-08T04:31:50Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-08-08T04:31:50Z | |
dc.date.created | 2017-08-08 | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Hepatitis is a common adverse effect of antituberculosis drugs. Silymarin prevented drug-induced hepatoxicity in animals with anti-oxidative mechanisms but its effect in human has been unknown. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of silymarin for preventing antituberculosis-drug induced liver injury (antiTB-DILI) in patients with tuberculosis. Methods: A double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial was performed. Tuberculosis patients were randomly allocated to receive placebo or silymarin. The outcomes of interests were antiTB-DILI and the maximum liver enzymes at week 4. Antioxidative enzymes (i.e., superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione and malondialdehyde assays) were assessed. The risks of antiTB-DILI between the two groups were compared. A number need to treat was estimated. Results: A total of 55 out of 70 expected numbers of patients were enrolled. There were 1/27 (3.7 %) and 9/28 (32.1 %) patients who developed antiTB-DILI in the silymarin and the placebo groups. Risk reduction was 0.28 (0.10, 0.47), i.e., receiving silymarin was 28 % at lower risk for antiTB-DILI than placebo. This led to prevention of 28 patients from being antiTB-DILI among 100 treated patients. Median (IQR) of ALT levels at week 4 in the placebo and the silymarin group were 35.0 (15, 415) IU/L and 31.5 (20, 184) IU/L (p = 0.455). The decline of SOD level at week 4 in the silymarin group was less than the placebo group (p < 0.027). Conclusions: Silymarin reduced the incidence of antiTB-DILI. The benefit of silymarin may be explained from superoxide dismutase restoration. Larger clinical trials are required to confirm the result of our small study [Clinicaltrials.Gov Identifier Nct01800487]. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine. Vol. 15, (2015), 334 | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1186/s12906-015-0861-7 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/2715 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.rights | Mahidol University | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | BioMed Central | en_US |
dc.subject | Open Access article | en_US |
dc.subject | Drug-induced liver injury | en_US |
dc.subject | Hepatotoxicity | en_US |
dc.subject | Tuberculosis | en_US |
dc.subject | Silymarin | en_US |
dc.subject | Antioxidant | en_US |
dc.title | A double-blinded randomized controlled trial of silymarin for the prevention of antituberculosis drug-induced liver injury | en_US |
dc.type | Research Article | en_US |
dspace.entity.type | Publication |