Publication:
Comparison of surgical outcomes between fixation with hook plate and loop suspensory fixation for acute unstable acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

dc.contributor.authorAlisara Arirachakaranen_US
dc.contributor.authorManusak Boonarden_US
dc.contributor.authorPeerapong Piyapittayanunen_US
dc.contributor.authorVajarin Phiphobmongkolen_US
dc.contributor.authorKornkit Chaijenkijen_US
dc.contributor.authorJatupon Kongtharvonskulen_US
dc.contributor.otherPolice General Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherSrinakarin Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-11T03:32:33Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-14T08:02:13Z
dc.date.available2018-12-11T03:32:33Z
dc.date.available2019-03-14T08:02:13Z
dc.date.issued2016-08-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2016, Springer-Verlag France. Treatment of acute (≤4 weeks) high-grade acromioclavicular (AC) joint separation (types III–VI) is still controversial. Currently, the two modern techniques that are widely used include hook plate fixation and coracoclavicular (CC) ligament fixation using a suspensory loop device (tightrope, synthetic ligament or absorbable polydioxansulfate sling). These techniques are both reported to have superior clinical outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess and compare clinical outcomes of hook plate fixation versus fixation of the CC ligament using a loop suspensory fixation (LSF) device for the treatment of AC joint injury. These clinical outcomes consist of the Constant–Murley score (CMS), pain visual analog score (VAS) and postoperative complications. Relevant comparative studies were identified from MEDLINE and Scopus from inception to October 5, 2015. Five of 571 studies were eligible; 5, 3, 3, and 5 studies were included in the pooling of CMS, pain VAS, surgical time and postoperative complications, respectively. The unstandardized mean difference (UMD) of the CMS for LSF was 4.43 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.73, 8.14], which was statistically significantly higher than the CMS in hook plate fixation. For VAS, the UMD was 0.02 points (95 % CI −3.54, 3.73) higher than LSF but without statistical significance. The surgical time of LSF was 16.21 min (95 % CI 6.27, 26.15) statistically significantly higher than hook plate fixation. LSF had a lower chance of postoperative complications by 0.62 units (95 % CI 0.30, 1.32) when compared to hook plate fixation, but this also was not statistically significant. In acute high-grade AC joint injuries, loop suspensory fixation had higher postoperative functional CMS and mean surgical time when compared to hook plate fixation. However, for postoperative VAS and complication rates, there were no statistically significant differences between groups. Level of evidence IVen_US
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology. Vol.26, No.6 (2016), 565-574en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00590-016-1797-4en_US
dc.identifier.issn14321068en_US
dc.identifier.issn16338065en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84975467394en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/41274
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84975467394&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleComparison of surgical outcomes between fixation with hook plate and loop suspensory fixation for acute unstable acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a systematic review and meta-analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84975467394&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections