Publication:
Formulaic prediction of Z-plasty outcomes relative to Z scar lengthening, Z flap tension, and area of distortion, and determination of the multiple Z-plasty configurations that optimally increase Z scar length, decrease Z flap tension, and decrease area of distortion

dc.contributor.authorNutthawut Akaranuchaten_US
dc.contributor.authorJongdee Aojanepongen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-27T10:15:40Z
dc.date.available2020-01-27T10:15:40Z
dc.date.issued2019-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2019, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University. Objective: To generate mathematical formulas to predict Z-plasty outcomes relative to Z scar lengthening, Z flap tension, and area of distortion, and to determine the multiple Z-plasty configurations that optimally increase Z scar length, decrease Z flap tension, and decrease area of distortion. Methods: Each Z-plasty configuration was evaluated for highest percent Z scar lengthening, lowest tension to close Z flap, and lowest area of distortion. For part 1 of the study, conventional one-flap, two-flap, four-flap, and eight-flap Z-plasties were created, after which relocation of the Z flaps was performed. The outcomes were analyzed and formulas were generated to predict Z-plasty outcomes. In part 2, the following modifications to the four-flap Z-plasty were made: modification of Z flap angle, modification of Z flap limb size, and addition of a gap between each Z flap. Outcomes were evaluated to identify the configuration that produced the optimal outcome for each outcome measure. Results: Thirty-six pig skins were incised and sutured under controlled condition. For part 1, one-flap Z-plasty was best for Z scar lengthening, and 8-flap Z-plasty was best for reducing both tension to close and area of distortion. Three formulas were generated to predict the studied outcomes of Z-plasty. For part 2, the configuration that added a gap of 75% of the central limb length yielded the best outcome for scar length and also work very well for reducing the tension to close. The conventional design was the best for minimizing area of distortion. Conclusion: Mathematical formulas were generated to predict Z scar percent lengthening, Z flap tension to close, and area of distortion. Addition of a gap 75% of the central limb length was the most efficacious Z-plasty configuration for increasing Z scar length.en_US
dc.identifier.citationSiriraj Medical Journal. Vol.71, No.6 (2019), 506-514en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.33192/Smj.2019.75en_US
dc.identifier.issn22288082en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85077564340en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/51996
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85077564340&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleFormulaic prediction of Z-plasty outcomes relative to Z scar lengthening, Z flap tension, and area of distortion, and determination of the multiple Z-plasty configurations that optimally increase Z scar length, decrease Z flap tension, and decrease area of distortionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85077564340&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections