Publication:
Screening and brief interventions for hazardous and harmful alcohol use among hospital outpatients in South Africa: Results from a randomized controlled trial

dc.contributor.authorSupa Pengpiden_US
dc.contributor.authorKarl Peltzeren_US
dc.contributor.authorLinda Skaalen_US
dc.contributor.authorHendry Van Der Heeveren_US
dc.contributor.otherSefako Makgatho Health Sciences University (SMU)en_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Limpopoen_US
dc.contributor.otherHuman Sciences Research Council of South Africaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-19T05:21:09Z
dc.date.available2018-10-19T05:21:09Z
dc.date.issued2013-07-16en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: High prevalence rates of hazardous and harmful alcohol use have been found in a hospital outpatient setting in South Africa. Hospital settings are a particularly valuable point of contact for the delivery of brief interventions because of the large access to patient populations each year. With this in mind, the primary purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to provide screening for alcohol misuse and to test the effectiveness of brief interventions in reducing alcohol intake among hospital outpatients in South Africa. Methods. The study design for this effectiveness study is a randomized controlled trial with 6- and 12-month follow-ups to examine the effects of a brief alcohol intervention to reduce alcohol use by hazardous or harmful drinkers in a hospital setting. Outpatients were screened for alcohol problems, and those identified as hazardous or harmful drinkers were randomized into an experimental or control group. The experimental group received one brief counselling session on alcohol risk reduction, while the control group received a health education leaflet. Results: Of the 1419 screened for alcohol misuse who agreed to participate in the trial 392 (27.6%) screened positive for hazardous or harmful use on the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT) (score 7/8-19) and 51 (3.6%) had an AUDIT score of 20 or more. Among the 282 (72%) hospital outpatients who also attended the 12-month follow-up session, the time effects on the AUDIT scores were significant [F (1,195 = 7.72), P < 0.01] but the intervention effect on the AUDIT score was statistically not significant [F (1,194 = 0.06), P < 0.804]. Conclusion: Given the lack of difference in outcome between control and intervention group, alcohol screening and the provision of an alcohol health education leaflet may in itself cause reduction in drinking. Trial registration. PACTR201110000319392. © 2013 Pengpid et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.en_US
dc.identifier.citationBMC Public Health. Vol.13, No.1 (2013)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1471-2458-13-644en_US
dc.identifier.issn14712458en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84880030607en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/32257
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84880030607&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleScreening and brief interventions for hazardous and harmful alcohol use among hospital outpatients in South Africa: Results from a randomized controlled trialen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84880030607&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections